James R. Wiley

Stanford 2022-03-26 09:01:09

The semi-documentary-style storytelling method is very novel. The disadvantage is that the editing is relatively confusing. The story is disrupted by the real narrative part as soon as it starts to develop, and the integrity of the story is more difficult. At first glance, the high score feels...

Delia 2022-03-29 09:01:06

If one day, when you realize that there are tens of millions of original books in the almost unsuspecting campus library at your fingertips; however, although your family is not at all risky, your friends are constantly rushing to tell you about this. How easy everything is, will you be tempted?...

Arely 2022-03-23 09:02:39

#SIFF# wins in the grasp of the young people's mentality of "knowing it was wrong but doing it" and the regret of looking back on the past, as well as the tense and loopy criminal process that is like taking drugs. In the retrospective interview, the past is covered with a Layers of lyrical colors (either serious or playful, like "Sunny"). The film will put the audience into a very sad state, especially when waiting for the police to come.

Maeve 2022-01-07 15:53:42

I feel that the story is still thin, and I can only forcefully use the combination of fiction and reality and the verbal mode of real characters to last two hours. Actors all like them, and they have their own characteristics, but the characters played are not interesting. As a crime film, especially the kind that is related to Quentin's falling water dog, it cannot be said to be a success. The falling water dog looks amazing in retrospect. Although the characters are stupid and manic, they are so charming!