María Ucedo

Cleveland 2022-04-21 09:02:28

It is a wonderful pseudo-documentary, and the conflict is arranged around the two concepts of conservative and enlightened. In the end, because of the same pure belief in religion, an agreement was reached, and the battle of change and compromise that echoed from the beginning to the end appeared...

Aniyah 2022-04-21 09:02:28

This is a film based on true events, telling the story of the previous Pope who abdicated to the next Pope after a scandal was exposed.

Seriously, before watching this movie, we may have always felt that the Pope was far away from us, as if it were a medieval thing.

But in fact, the Pope of Rome has...

Lyla 2022-04-24 07:01:14

1. The original title of the film was "(One) Pope", which was changed to "Two Popes" due to the joining of Hopkins, and the translation of "The Pope's Inheritance" was even more mistaken for a power. The drama of the struggle, I found it to be a biopic when I watched it. 2. This film has nothing to do with the Vatican. There is no whitewashing or public relations. Since it was not allowed to shoot on location, the Sistine Chapel in the film was replicated on the set, and St. Peter's Square was entirely made by CGI. . 3. A lot of plots are fictitious. The two never met in the villa and got along for several days. All the dialogues are made up. The whole film is filled with a lot of dialogue scenes, but the dialogues lack depth and are even boring. 4. Since it is positioned as an English-language film, it is necessary to speak English directly. As a result, it is necessary to pursue authenticity, so that Italian, Spanish, and Latin appear in large numbers. If you really want to pursue authenticity, how can a German and an Argentine speak English crazily in private? No accent? 5. Cue the Beatles' Abbey Road several times, only to use three versions of Blackbird as the soundtrack.

Dessie 2022-04-23 07:02:31

It involves the transition between the bishops of Rome and the changes needed by the Catholic Church to elect Pope Francis at that historic moment. The dialogue is somewhat trivial, lacking more substantive dialogue in place of useless flashbacks and respectful greetings. Jonathan Price's performance is superb and Anthony Hopkins is good, but not as good as Price.