-
Frederik 2022-04-19 09:03:11
partisanship
This is a classic movie, a classic among classics. I have watched every classic movie no less than three times, and every time I watch it, I have a new understanding.
I heard that this movie has a good reputation, so I went to the cinema to see it on the first weekend of its release. This movie is... -
Christiana 2022-03-25 09:01:22
Opposition parties are united!
In 1916, the audience sitting in the cinema watched this film and whispered, the Olympic Games were suspended due to World War I, modernism flooded the corners of western society, Yuan Shikai's restoration, the workers' strike in the industrial and commercial circles of the Republic of China,...

Russell Hicks
-
Zane 2022-04-22 07:01:54
Four sets of stories, each with at least two parallel lines, are interspersed back and forth in a total of nearly ten lines. Not to mention the time, it is difficult for the audience to understand now a hundred years later. The modern story is the main axis, and the plot is more tortuous; the big scene of the Babylonian attack and defense reached the climax of the first half, and the scene scheduling, special effects, and movement of the mirror are superb; the religious massacre and the crucifixion are set off by the card-style description, and the story is incomplete. Clothing sets and scene art are also the benchmarks for blockbusters.
-
Donato 2022-04-24 07:01:25
The theme is really grand, and the narrative structure is also very innovative, but I still feel sleepy. The ending scene is comparable to the illustrations of the Divine Comedy, and the elevation of love, peace, religion, etc. is a bit too deep.
Related articles
-
Intertitle: Universal justice, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a murder for a murder.
-
Judge of the Court: To be hanged by the neck until dead, dead, dead!