Steve Fuller

Steve Fuller

  • Born:
  • Height:
  • Extended Reading
    • Dannie 2022-03-25 08:01:02

      limited freedom

      The questions raised in this film are good and the approach is sufficiently oriented, but I still cannot be persuaded to support the continuation of the doctrine.

      Creationism has always been a helpless move in my eyes. People are not satisfied and ignorant about things that cannot be explained, and...

    • Ashleigh 2022-03-25 08:01:02

      A little bit of comment in SSS

      By now you've probably heard of "Expelled", the new Ben Stein anti-evolution crocumentary. It officially opens today, as I speak that's April 18th. Of my job, I've had the misfortune of sitting through this film twice now, at least I was getting paid. The film tries very hard to connect Darwin with...

    • Caterina 2022-03-25 08:01:02

      The Ku Klux Klan demanded freedom of speech, and the intelligent design theorists demanded the freedom of teaching on campus, but after seeing the ugliness and distortion of evolutionists in this film, you can know that once the "firm believers", including the editors and directors, gain power, they will never be able to do so. No freedom will be given to the so-called "heretics".

    • Mckenzie 2022-03-25 09:01:23

      Sometimes there is or is not, it all depends on whether you believe it or not, it doesn't matter what the origin is.

    Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed quotes

    • David Berlinski: It'd be nice to see the scientific establishment lose some of its prestige and power. It'd be nice to see other questions being opened up. Above all, it'd be nice to have a real spirit of self-criticism penetrating the sciences.

    • Alister McGrath: Richard Dawkins has a charming, and very I think interesting view of the relationship between science and religion. They're at war with each other. And in the end, one's got to win. And it's going to be science. It's a very naive view. It's based on a complete historical misrepresentation of the way science and religion has been directed. Dawkins seems to think that scientific description is an anti-religious argument. Describing how something happens scientifically, somehow explains it away. It doesn't. But the questions of purpose, intentionality, the question why, still remain there on the table.