-
Myrl 2021-12-30 17:21:44
History, human nature and national interests are entangled, and God will become incompetent. Standing in front of people all over the world, justice, truth and human rights are always worth defending. Must be recommended by five stars. Every time the court is held, it is a passionate complaint, and the chest tightness is boiling...
-
Wade 2021-12-30 17:21:44
【Www.youtube.com/watch?v=GagXIYvnY1s】"But to be logical is not to be right, and nothing on God's earth could ever make it...
-
George 2021-12-30 17:21:44
Everyone who tries to persuade the world is still unable to face it; behind every grand reason, there are countless darkness breeds; the cause of every war is nothing but the struggle for interests and power, countless cannon fodder is only official number. Wonderful argument, enjoyable group drama, difficult to finalize the...
-
Nyasia 2021-12-30 17:21:44
The biggest crime of the Nazi Party in World War II was the genocide of millions of Jews. For this crime, the defense lawyers reasoned that these crimes were not committed by the four men sitting in the dock because they were just To complete their work, but the sin committed by the whole world against Hitler's connivance! In many cases, this is the best excuse for a bad person to exonerate himself! One thing is wrong, so the executor is also...
-
Shaina 2021-12-30 17:21:44
The form and connotation are very rich. In terms of form, the court scenes in the enclosed space are colorful and just right. In terms of connotation, the debate involving several important issues such as war responsibilities, judicial procedures, and post-war reconciliation has made people think about many...
-
Karson 2021-12-30 17:21:44
This is almost the greatest court scene ever, much better than the twelve angry men. As an indoor scene, the in-camera scheduling is very good, although I am very insensitive to jerking the scene. The script laid an extremely solid foundation for the film. From the superficial lines to the narrative structure to the deep-level scrutiny of legal ethics and politics, it is all painstaking work. All performances are accurate! It is necessary for Schell to shine, and several supporting roles are...
-
Aurelia 2021-12-30 17:21:44
Impeccable from connotation to technique, it is really great. Thoughts on the meaning of the country and attitude towards history, legal speculation, moving long mirrors, sliding lenses, and the wonderful performance of the overall cast, each point is fascinating enough. Special mention of Bertrand Lancaster, his role once again shocked me, and the performances of Montgomery Clift and Judy Garland were also very...
-
Jessika 2021-12-30 17:21:44
Worth ten stars. This movie is a logical feast for a moralist like me who believes in science and reason. Delimma is complicated because the options are often logically self-consistent. At this time, the key to the problem is the measurement of the principles/spirit behind the logic of each option. This is why open and free debate, "under ideal circumstances", is so important not only for the courts but also for the community. Not to mention that it is possible to eliminate opinions without...
-
Angelica 2021-12-30 17:21:44
The film is too rich and profound. The trial of these judges who executed the Nazi orders during World War II is a classic case of ethical dilemma. Whether it is conscience or mechanical blind obedience, although it is not a butcher knife in hand, it is based on the basic principles of civilization. Evil deeds will never escape the blame. However, the insignificance of the individual appears so helpless and sad in the operation of the huge state apparatus, even the clever and just people are...
-
Dakota 2021-12-30 17:21:44
Chief Judge Dan Haywood: In such an environment, it is not surprising that everyone will commit a crime. Imagine that people will never forget that people’s distortions can happen easily only because of politics, betraying friendship and loyalty, and murdering children. They are also available in our country. In spite of the protection of national interests, everything is the same. When fighting desperately, the best way is to borrow a knife to kill. But the country is not a rock, the country...
Judgment at Nuremberg Comments
-
Salma 2022-03-22 09:02:01
Don't claim to be kind
Was the mass murder of Jews caused by Hitler alone? Who are the national heroes and national leaders? People's social nature determines that people's behavior must conform to social standards, and who is the maker of social standards? Why is there a situation of collective out of control? One can...
-
Salma 2022-03-24 09:02:11
born human
The sin of the executor is
in a state machine. Is the executor guilty? Is there anything wrong?
The executioner kills people, it's his job, and it's legally and morally clean. Therefore, by analogy, the only thing the executor has to do is to obey the order, and the right or wrong of this...
-
Mrs. Bertholt: I saw Mr. Perkins today. He told me they'd showed those pictures in the courtroom. Col. Lawson's favorite pictures. He drags them out at any pretext, doesn't he? Col. Lawson's private chamber of horrors. Is that what you think we are? Do you think we knew of those things? Do you think we wanted to murder women and children? Do you believe that? Do you?
Judge Dan Haywood: Mrs. Bertholt, I don't know what to believe.
Mrs. Bertholt: Good God. We're sitting here drinking. How could you think that we knew? We did not know. We did not know!
Judge Dan Haywood: As far as I can make out, no one in this country knew.
-
Mrs. Bertholt: One can't live with hate, I know that. Dan, we have to forget, if we are to go on living.
Director: Stanley Kramer
Language: English,German Release date: December 18, 1961