Star Trek: The Motion Picture Comments

Earnestine 2022-09-19 08:41:06

The 1979 film, the slow-paced long-shot unique to early sci-fi films? (For example, the earlier 2001 Space Odyssey) the ending is still a bit of a turning point, the satellite's 100-year search for the father, the communication between mechanical life and carbon-based life, and the final combination (feeling like a star child), a very good...

Amir 2022-09-18 21:57:57

The slow pace really makes people a little anxious, but because it contains a lot of information, people can't complain. When I thought "Is it because I didn't watch the TV series and couldn't understand what it said", I suddenly realized because of the short film review of "making love to save the earth". In short, farewell to the special effects, such pure sci-fi is really...

Geovany 2022-09-14 07:11:59

I can now understand why some people say that the first film was not well done. It may be because there are too many empty shots and too much energy is spent on showing "the motion picture", which makes the story less exciting. But I wish I could witness that era, see the vast universe on the big screen, the vast starry sky, and see the ideals and hopes of human beings condensed and unfolded slowly like a picture scroll in these 2...

Julius 2022-09-11 15:58:11

It's not unreasonable that Star Trek can rival the Star Wars series, and even vaguely surpass it. In this seemingly very commercial mainstream movie, except for the slightly old-fashioned fusion of Decker and V'Ger at the end, it's a very special concept. The lengthy depiction of interstellar travel makes the film sluggish in modern terms. But this slow rhythm reflects the vastness of the stars and V'Ger's three hundred years of...

Alivia 2022-04-24 07:01:14

SPOCK's makeup is a little thicker -- it's...

Octavia 2022-04-24 07:01:14

SPOCK's makeup is a little thicker -- it's...

Elouise 2022-04-23 06:01:02

The overall rhythm is dull, there are still some surprises at the end, and the theme music is old...