The Trial of the Chicago 7 Comments

Dominic 2022-03-26 09:01:05

Like a political essay, arguing about whether it is on the surface or not, without the slightest attempt to penetrate the hearts of the characters, everyone is an empty speech machine that can't stop. This is not a movie, it is clearly a spit meeting that is not funny at...

Junius 2022-03-26 09:01:05

The film was well shot. But there is a better angle: it turns out that Americans are so disgusted with the Vietnam War simply because too many American soldiers died. It’s no wonder that we don’t take to the streets to fight the war now. Thanks to drones and missiles, the American people are not bothered by the thousands of victims of the invaded countries. How many Vietnamese civilians died during the Vietnam War, oh, no...

Martina 2022-03-26 09:01:05

I wrote the news about this film seven years ago. Sorkin began to write the script in 2008. The first time he was going to shoot it for Spielberg, he even changed three major directors. . It has been delayed until the eve of this year's general election, and it just happened to have a new era significance. The film does not show the crazy performance art of Epis, and almost all of the space is devoted to his best literary and opera lines, and the machine gun-like intensive shooting. "The way is...

Emery 2022-03-26 09:01:05

To some people, this movie exposes the shame of America, but it also reveals what America is and why America is great - a vigorous and vigorous civil society, where dissent is involved, citizens have channels to express their opinions, and at critical moments they can Rely on the conscience and justice of ordinary...

Abelardo 2022-03-26 09:01:05

Never experienced my own mind being...

Corene 2022-03-25 09:01:08

Alan Sorkin is another wonderful court trial story. The first court trial is full of tension, and it outlines the characters of several main characters, which is really powerful. The core of the entire film is focused on the trial, which is tense, intense, and bloody. The final closing statement was too...

Grant 2022-03-25 09:01:08

Alan Sorkin's long-awaited historical legal film recreates the pre-convicted and manipulated trial after the anti-Vietnam War movement in 1968. The filming is very neat, the court debate and the past flashbacks are cross-narrated, the lines are still as sharp and sonorous as always, but unfortunately the audio-visual language is still relatively rigid, the group portraits are focused, and some characters are not portrayed as flesh and blood, but the performances of several old actors Convincing...

Hilton 2022-03-25 09:01:08

3.5/5. People in 1968 are asking us what kind of image we will leave for 50 years later. Today, 50 years later, the emotions of 68 years seem to come back to our faces, just like the movie itself, with a clear picture. The "repeat of the past" to initiate a problem that seemed overdue in '68. It's just that the creation of this era has become more banal, conservative and radical, freely submissive, or, like here, watching fire in warm...

Blaze 2022-03-25 09:01:08

Watching this movie is like taking a class. It truly shows us what the civil society on the other side of the ocean looked like in the early 1970s, what a lawyer in a civil society should look like, and what a citizen in a civil society should have. Soothing those helpless souls... Thanks to Netflix for its wonderful presentation, thanks to the selfless dedication of the great gods of "Everyone Film and Television", and thanks to the little cracks that appeared in the dark, we still have the...

Elinore 2022-03-25 09:01:08

"My contempt is nothing compared to the contempt of my...