Unproven Unknown Error

Lela 2021-12-31 08:02:04

Successful learning books have always been good sellers. People buy these books for the purpose of grafting other people's experience to themselves. This kind of thinking is understandable, but I suspect that a person without reflection, after reading other people's stories, can discover the neglected details from his own failures in the past? People who don’t have the habit of reflection can hardly gain anything from this kind of story.

There are many reasons for a person's success, and the inevitable reasons must include the comprehensive use of ability, diligence, resources, experience and other elements. If the effect is good, people will apply these factors repeatedly, thereby strengthening the value of these factors and storing them as experience.

However, these experiences will not be "one sentence worth 10,000 sentences" and apply everywhere. This is a question that "BEING THERE" wants to talk about.

Humans are complex animals. In order to easily manipulate others, some people disregard their own complexity, but require others to have a simple mind and one thing to say. Labeling a person is the most convenient way to judge a person, but to decompose a person by labeling, it ignores that it is a flesh and blood, changing emotions, entanglements with interests, unrealized ideals, conscience or no conscience. Prerequisite, so tagging people seems to be simple and fast, but it actually ignores many details.

Most of the time, people only see the shining points of successful people, and their unknown backside is ignored, and the truth is more likely to be hidden here. For example, we have heard stories about scientists' embarrassment when we were young, such as "boiled the watch as an egg", "and accidentally drank ink when drinking tea". At one point I was surprised at this. How could a clever mind make such inexplicable low-level mistakes? Later, after I realized that the world is rich and colorful, not what I want to do, I suddenly understood why those smart people do things in a muddled way. Smart people make mistakes because they are not in the moment. In their own thinking, at work, in planning, and calculations, they always consider obtaining more benefits instead of protecting the immediate benefits. You see that person is there, what you see is only the physical person, but the spirit is not there. This kind of thing is always reflected in ordinary people. Many people walked on the road and remembered that their luggage was still in the taxi just now. He didn't hold the purchased merchandise in his hand.

It happened that a taxi driver also had this question. I expressed this idea in the car-customers lose things so easily, you may think he is short-sighted, but at that time people are thinking about how to get more benefits, or straighten out Various relationships. The driver agrees very much, but I have to admit that this answer is a bit redundant. People who have not succeeded need to see deficiencies in those who have succeeded before they can be satisfied with themselves. This careful thinking is worthless and may prevent people from making progress. However, many people can’t get rid of it. So while I am self-warning, I also want to tell people who can’t see hope: Leaders go to the toilet themselves, you don’t have to deify them, if they If you don’t do it yourself, you will need something like a urinary catheter.

Successful people are less likely to make low-level mistakes, which is one reason why they are more successful than others. But what happens if they make big mistakes?

A person seldom gets sick. If you get sick, it may be a desperate disease (I don’t like the term terminal illness, and is it really terminal illness); a person’s life will be smooth, and a blow may never turn back; a person is selfish, If people flatter and flatter themselves when they gain power, they are likely to fall into trouble when they fall into Pingyang. (If a person wants to progress and succeed, he must learn from each other's weaknesses and reform his own shortcomings; if a country wants to rise, have strength, and be respected, it must also face the dark side, allow criticism, and continuously improve. Only in this way can people not eat melamine and avoid being mentally ill. , Not to be distorted-but reality is not like this. Most stupid people do not allow others to criticize the country, so they guarantee their right to eat melamine safely, freely, happily and happily.)

Shans is Although a patient with cerebral palsy was adopted by the landlord to take care of the garden since he was young, the landlord only regarded Shansi as a free gardener. He had no driver's license, no credit card, no medical records, and he was wearing a hand-made coat and police underwear from the landlord in 1928. He lives and works in this world, but he is always a black house. It's just that he has never realized this. He breathes free air, works freely, and is content with food and clothing (leaders like you to be content with it the most). But one day the landlord died suddenly, Shansi did not receive any gifts, including a place to live, and he was thrown into society at a loss with nothing, which naturally made people worry about how he could adapt to the outside environment. But such worries are unnecessary.

With the gorgeous background and scary music, Shans plunged into the society in stride and got acquainted with the presidential adviser Ben. He has a huge family business, a lofty status, and a huge influence, but his health is declining and there is not much to come. Generally speaking, people who have achieved such achievements are experienced, unique insight, and flexible in communication; rich experience makes him tolerant and peaceful, and unique insight allows him to obtain benefits such as seeking out things, and the performance of communicative flexibility is more suggestive and metaphorical expressions. ——This is also "leave three points to the mouth" advocated by Chinese people.

It’s just that Shansi’s superb interpersonal skills can’t be relied upon and cannot be used at all. So when Shansi talks about gardening, the metaphorical Ben takes his words as metaphors, and finds for these metaphors that don’t exist. A reasonable explanation is given. When people like something, they naturally justify it. Even if there are many obvious loopholes, they will be ignored and buried under various excuses. The tricks of scammers are always full of loopholes, but people just turn a blind eye to unreasonable problems in order to get what the scammers have in their hands. Sometimes it's not the liar who lied to them, but they lied to themselves-of course, the culprit should be blamed on the liar. In the film, it is not only Shansi who endorses Shansi, but Shansi is in a difficult situation that cannot be justified, and it is explained by human or external interference. Everyone who likes and fawns on Shans is striving to maintain its perfection.

Shans has no ideas about power, money, and emotions. He just lives in his own world, while maintaining the good habits of being polite, elegant, tolerant, and unexplaining to make others comfortable and make himself mysterious. People put their imaginations and opinions on Shans, and they get exactly the results they want, because Shans has nothing, he just slightly changes the scene in front of him like a mirror, and feeds it back with another look. Narcissistic people. People found that their bizarre ideas were confirmed by Shans before they were convinced of their claims, and became confident and resolute. From then on, they couldn't do without Shans's support. The president even lost his sexual interest because he couldn’t get Shans’s information, and he couldn’t respond to his lover’s call; what’s more, a man seduce him and be willing to bend down in front of him, but Shans mentioned that he likes it in a timely manner. Look", so the man excitedly went to find another man to perform male-male collaboration for him. At the same time, the legend about Shans intensified, "He can speak 96,460,380 languages ​​in 8 languages", "He is as accomplished in the field of medicine as in the field of politics and economics."

At this time, the disease started from Shansi alone with cerebral palsy, and became a collective shared brainlessness. The attention of authority figures has shaped Shansi's status; Shansi's mystery and unpredictability have added luster to it, and it has also caused panic among the crowd; people have added fuel to spread the increasingly deviating truth from the truth, setting off a growing upsurge of personality worship. This is human nature. (I bought "The Story of a Fox Beating a Hunter" by Ben Jinjin for my children a few years ago. The address of Dangdang.com is that the fox accidentally "beat" the hunter. Since then, its reputation has become more and more popular among the crowd. Things. I think Mr. Jin Jin understands human nature very well. This book should help children stay awake and avoid falling into superstitions.)

But not everyone falls into the superstition of Shans. Ben's personal doctor knew the complete truth, and remained awake on the sidelines, but after hearing Ben's evaluation of Shans, he gave up on telling the truth. His silence and gaze have become the wonderful narration of this film. Amidst flattery and brilliance, he is the only one who insists on his logical ability and insists on discovering the truth on his own, not the results that others tell him. It's just that this sober man has become an alternative. When the sick Shans discusses the situation with Ben and the president, he is being checked by security personnel.

Watching this movie always makes people feel suspicious, worrying that Shans will not be able to end it. I am also worried that Shans gave Eve so much hope and made so much sacrifice. If she can't make her beautiful fantasy a perfect result in the end, what a pain it will be! But what is deceiving is that Shans never promised anything. He was always innocent. Although in the eyes of others, his ambiguous attitude was a promise, but he did not say it after all. When Eve took the initiative to give him a hug and Shans had nowhere to go, "Like to watch" became his shield again. Whenever there is a crisis, the choice of "watching on the sidelines" always lifts Shansi from the flooding river and makes him stop in the river. It's just that Eve masturbates to him. It is a completely speechless tragedy. The crazier, the happier, the more liberated, and the more free she is, the stronger and the sadder the irony is. Because all visions are illusions, will the human liberation obtained by Eve through masturbation be real liberation?

The film says these connotations are already very remarkable, but "BEING THERE" has more obscure meanings. How to treat the disabled should be regarded as an index for evaluating a society. Disabled people are disadvantaged and a minority. Whether they can be treated well or not reflects the tolerance, tolerance and humane degree of the system. Nazi Germany not only killed the Jews, but also killed the mental patients in the country. Even if the people defending the Nazis did not know about the killing of the Jews, they at least knew the strange disappearance of the patients around them. Friends who have watched the documentary "The Story of the Soviet Union" will probably remember Bernard Shaw's claim that some people in society are worthless. If they cannot prove their worth, then how to deal with them, including killing them, is a legitimate practice. But if you can't prove your value, is it really worthless?

This movie is full of humane care and bizarre paradoxes, which is to justify the forgotten and disadvantaged people. The screenwriter, director, and actor performed a rebellious legend with absurd stories. In the film, Shans Gardener was misunderstood as Chauncey Gudana by Eve when he introduced himself, which is the beginning of the legend, and at the same time it shifts to a more concealed expression. This blog has an article "Reading "Modernity and the Holocaust" (Lin Xianji)", in which there is a passage "Bauman has repeatedly described such a modern "gardening" view of the country, saying that as a country, the vast number of ruled It is just the "gardeners" who are engaged in activities such as designing, planting and spraying weeds." In this paper, Shansi's identity as a gardener and the suspense created by gardening techniques are all caring for the ruled and forgotten vulnerable groups. Shans's polite, elegant, tolerant, and unexplainable performance in the film makes the theory in "The Art of Pretending" seem very superficial. In line with this, the language of the film, shooting techniques, and even the inserted images and music are all extremely delicate, which well sets off the plot and aura.

Shans is a mirror in which people only see themselves.

View more about Being There reviews

Extended Reading
  • Roderick 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    This film is very strangely shot. It can be described as God in a political satire telling you the "Tao". Although the Tao is very Tao, it still has to be spoken. It can't just stay in the water and laugh. Western natural philosophy is a kind of sensory thinking, Descartes's cogito think therefore I am, this thinking is a kind of scientific analysis of the external world, it is memory, experience, objective, but does not return to the heart. It is different from the "thinking" that is experienced with the heart in Chinese philosophy. The thoughtless image of the gardener who is close to the "Tao" in the film may be inspired by Andy Warhol's mirror philosophy, but to understand Andy Warhol, you must know that he was actually a writer, His reading volume is amazing, language cannot represent things in themselves, but to explain things ultimately comes back to language. It would be better for the original script to end with the love of a gardener. Tao is sentient.

  • Era 2022-04-21 09:02:30

    The face of peter sellers is calm and honest, but it contains a powerful irony. . .

Being There quotes

  • Chance the Gardener: [Lifts his hat like the Coachman from TV]

  • TV: Basketball Jones! Basketball Jones!