The only witness in the film did not act and was subjected to ice torture, which reflected the indifferent side of his human nature. The judge was almost beaten The drowned pig drowned. It reflects the sanctimonious side of human nature. I am most sympathetic to the manslaughter. It is wrong to kill someone by mistake, but it is not his fault to be given a light sentence. I believe no one will ask for a light sentence because of the light sentence. He was sent back for retrial. Several flashbacks about the murderer in the film also showed the pain and deep self-blame of the murderer, and "Jigsaw" also mentioned in the film that the manslaughter was also due to this car accident. Changed his life, how? Did you bribe the judge or do you have a background? Or is it because the boy suddenly ran into the road and got hit? I think the third idea is probably the most logical, there is still racism in the United States, but it is unreasonable for a white judge to deliberately favor a black man, if The father of the little boy was black, and the driver who hit the car was a white man. The judge made the sentence lightly. If the boy was hit and killed by riding a child's bicycle, the main responsibility for his death lies with the guardian, not the person who hit him. , I believe that no country will allow a few-year-old child to ride a child's bicycle on the road. So the black man who killed someone with a car was only sentenced to six months. Then why would a father who did not fulfill his guardianship responsibilities would Why don't you take good care of your children if you hate people who drive cars and run into people without reviewing yourself??
Moreover, according to the style of "jigsaw", the prey needs to be interrogated psychologically, and why a black boy who murdered by mistake and blamed himself in pain, why was "jigsaw" using such a cruel killing machine, just to test The forgiveness of a father with poor custody?? But in the end, the way the black man was punished and the hatred of the child's father against the man made me think that the film may also give us such a hint that "the black man distorts the truth, and the only The witnesses refused to testify in court". So the father of the child is full of hatred for black people without self-blame. But it is very contradictory to say this. The woman who was punished was mentioned in the film as the only witness, from the film Look, when the child's father entered the freezer, he didn't seem to know the only witness at all, so how did the child's father know that the facts were distorted?? Could it be that the child's father also witnessed the entire car accident process, but it could not be regarded as Witnesses?? Welcome to discuss.
View more about Saw III reviews
