Not funny at all, but rather boring.
To put it mildly, the director did not analyze the characters well. To put it badly, deliberately vilify historical figures. From the time when the pharaoh summoned the three famous people in history to when they asked if the sacrificial robe worn by the pharaoh was a skirt, they were struck by lightning. Please what are they? A dictator in history! (seems to have misremembered) Since they did such a big thing, they wouldn't say such rude words, okay? Normal people would think this person is rude, let alone them? If they were like this, they didn't succeed, OK? Napoleon, he is someone who is proud of the French people until now, and then when he came to NAM, he became a person who is very careful and sensitive to the topic of his height? excuse me? Trouble the director to take a good look at the history! According to the historical analysis of the characters, Napoleon made such great achievements (in some respects), he had lofty ambitions, and he considered for a long time, how could he be entangled in height? ? And you always say that the two are boyfriend and girlfriend relationship? It's not Napoleon! When the Pharaoh asked the three of them if they were willing to cooperate, they agreed without thinking? WHAT? No brainer would make such hasty decisions, let alone them?
Thinkers, is the realm of thought so vulgar? What he thinks is the world! It's philosophical reasoning! Think about the meaning of life! His ideological realm is lofty, how could he keep trying to get to the statue on the opposite side? This is not the Thinker. If you really think the plot is interesting, you can sculpt a statue yourself. Don't let the Thinker, the most representative sculpture in art history, take the blame.
There are also some plots that strike me, and I will not go into them one by one. To sum up: a movie with little connotation, it is not recommended to watch it.
View more about Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian reviews
