The last episode has many flaws, but the biggest flaw is that this episode may be the biggest spoiler for the next ten years of Marvel movies, just because the last episode is the ending, all timelines, everyone's ending, there is no other solution. The only suspense is whether Legacy Kang was killed, but no matter which solution, it will eventually fall into the cycle. Whether it is the sacred timeline or the multiverse, it is just a story of his reincarnation.
Regarding the interpretation of Kang in the last episode, most of them discuss whether the legacy Kang is good or bad, but does it really matter whether it is good or bad? This legacy Kang, the reason why he said "see u soon" before he died is because he always said that he would still sit here in the end, that he would defeat Kang of all timelines, that he would set up tva, and that he would still be here. Will get old and get bored and find Loki to take over, right? Whether he is in his own timeline or in the multiverse timeline, this legacy Kang is a god-like existence, and it doesn't matter whether he kills him or takes over. By the time he was born in the 31st century, whether it was the Divine Timeline or the Multiverse, he would once again become a legacy and triumph over all.
Such a multiverse cycle is also a form of fatalism. Can the multiverse represent free will?
View more about Loki reviews
