10 good movies I watched in 2012

Yvonne 2022-03-26 09:01:06

At first I thought it should be a discussion on the rationality of gun ownership, but then I thought that the judicial process of the court trial should be the theme, but I didn't expect it to be a discussion about the jury system. The film offers at least the possibility that juries can be effectively and even legally manipulated. So the question is, can this system bring about fairness and justice? Especially under the judicial system of case law, will this uncertainty be magnified? Although the result of this film is "justice" under the ecological setting of the oriented plot, it does not give an answer directly. But just look across the Pacific, and the answer is pretty obvious. It is better to have the law to follow than to follow the law, because interfering with judicial justice requires at least a lot of chips and calculations, and this is precisely the possibility of a very small probability in the real world. Perhaps this is the thinking of the common law system. the compromise. The plot of the film is very ordinary, the revenge of a small-town couple against a gun manufacturer, mixed into the story of the jury guiding the direction of the verdict. But what is special about this film is that it is really novel from the perspective of the jury system, with excellent acting skills and lines, and 120 minutes does not seem procrastinating.

Micaela 2022-03-27 09:01:07

Jon who didn't wake up and Vichy who was baby fat... I've had enough. .