Psychedelic category discussion

Armando 2021-12-19 08:01:03

Forgive me for not getting a definite result at the end of the discussion...
Even after reading the film reviews, I still have a lot of ambiguity about the film, mainly the following two points: the
first and the most important point, is Frank and Simon alone or Two people, corresponding to them, are dead, whether they are one person or one personality.
The second point, which is closely related to the first point, is the point that we need to distinguish in the entire film, namely, which ones are true and which ones are false, especially the secret painting, does it exist or not.
First of all, if Frank and Simon are not the same person, the story is as simple as it seems to be understood. The only illusory part is that Simon killed four people for the first time. Under this premise, it was the female hypnotist who asked Simon to steal the painting. In the end, Simon died and Frank survived. The hypnotist fell in love with Frank and asked Frank to decide whether to forget this and forget her.
There are several doubts as follows: First, the soy sauce girl is so badly rotting, why hasn't it been discovered? And why is the dead soy sauce woman exactly the same as the woman Simon led him in the studio? The part of the introduction in the studio is obviously a hypnosis with a problem in the middle, that is, why is it not real, an unreal, unimportant woman appears at the same time in the hypnosis of recalled reality and illusion? Unless she is also illusory, the so-called reality of memories is also illusory. Second, Simon’s death. When the hit Simon fell into the water, there was no more shot of him. Only Frank was struggling in the water and came out of the pool. Such an important male number may not really be the one. Dead, why is there no lens? It's more like disappearance than death. Third, it is also a very absurd place. When Frank went to grab a painting, more than one person saw Frank. Why was Frank not wanted? In Simon’s memory, he saw Frank and even called Frank’s name, and Frank blatantly snatched the painting. The police should think that the painting was in Frank’s hand and should question Simon Frank’s situation, but there was no... The strange thing is that Simon was injured. Why didn't the other two people send him to the hospital? But he walked out after he woke up?
Also under the premise that Frank and Simon are not the same person, if the secret painting is false, then why does Frank appear? When Simon and the hypnotist talked about his quit gambling, they said that in order to steal the painting, find someone who can do this kind of thing to find Frank. Therefore, the premise that Frank and Simon are two people is that the secret painting must be done. it is true. But there are many doubts about the stealing painting...
So let's discuss the second situation: Frank and Simon are the same person, and the entire stealing painting incident is fake, so the entire stealing painting incident is hypnotized by a hypnotist, this There is a question. Frank is the one who survived. So Simon is Frank’s split personality, or is Simon a fictional character created by Frank in Hypnosis? In other words, Frank is the personality split from Simon, but in the end Frank survived? I think the most unlikely thing is that Simon is a fictional character in the dream, because at the end of the film, the hypnotist said that she thought she would think of Simon when she looked at the painting, but Frank thought. If Simon is a split personality of Frank, then the possessive Simon is removed by the hypnotist, and Frank stays behind, but it makes sense, but then why are the stories told from Simon's perspective? So I boldly assumed that Frank was the personality created by Simon in hypnosis. Because of the choice of the hypnotist and the struggle between Simon and Frank, the personality that survived was Frank.
But no matter who Frank and Simon are the masters, they are based on the story that stealing paintings are hypnotized. So where did the paintings hang behind the hypnotists in the most popular videos? Is it true or false?

View more about Trance reviews

Extended Reading
  • Lyda 2022-03-31 09:01:03

    A masterpiece of style by Danny Paul. I thought it was about a drug addict's drug use experience... It turned out to be hypnosis and memory confusion similar to memory fragments. In order to see a 10Bit suppressed MKV, I also installed the decoder for half a day. It turned out to be worth the money in the end. The psychedelic photography style coupled with the electronic music effect is really good! It's easy to be drawn in. After watching it and looking back, I found that there are many flaws in the plot. But the exquisite picture is really cool to see

  • Sunny 2022-04-23 07:02:27

    sci-fi sanitary film

Trance quotes

  • Elizabeth: We keep secrets from lots of people, but most of all we keep them from ourselves. And we call that forgetting.

  • [last lines]

    Elizabeth: Do you want to remember, or do you want to forget?