The core idea of the whole film is very problematic. In the mind-body issue, even if it is Dualism, even if it is true that mind and body belong to different dimensions, it has nothing to do with religion. The screenwriter is simply confusing concepts and pushing dualism into religion. He also made a fool of dalai-lama and asked about pig's feet, which was very philosophical.
"Ian, what would you do, if something spritual disprove your scientific beliefs?"
What the hell is this? Where and where is this?
First of all, there are no beliefs in science, only assumptions before proofs.
Secondly, there is no such thing as "disprove" in "science". You can say disprove a previous conclusion, but how can there be "disprove your scientific beliefs"?
Science will always evolve in the process of constantly updating the previous wrong views. Correcting the previous mistakes is the daily routine of scientific research. It is necessary to ask "what would you do"?
Secondly, it is necessary to use the "scientific method" to prove the existing conclusions. error, then what is proved should also be "scientific".
Secondly, some of the scenes in the film are also stupid.
The protagonist himself tried to win the Darwin Prize but failed. He climbed in and out of the unstable elevator to kill the heroine, and then he thought that he would be condemned by the society, and then he hurriedly used the guise of his own scientist. , Find an excuse to say that people are not dead, and they are drinking Ganges water in India, and they are alive and well.
In the end, the young girl brought the 8-year-old girl into the hotel, closed the door and played threesome videos in front of her wife, and played some guessing games. In the end, I couldn't stop playing it. It's really a nonsense assumption that the data can't confirm. I just want to give him a letter, right? So capricious?
View more about I Origins reviews
