Gemini's sympathetic love, the third person who thinks that they are more reasonable and therefore should be more sympathetic. What exactly is love? The era and characters of the plot are interesting. A good background in a movie, placed outside the window and let the characters talk a few words, is conducive to enriching the character's image; while a bad background is just a false scene behind it. The rise of the left-wing student movement in Europe and the United States and the development of film art have brought more "value" to the three young people who are close to the times and the things they claim to love, beyond love and life (emphasis in double quotation marks). There are three or more points (left-wing, movies, love, life) with different views and attitudes, sometimes harmonious and sometimes conflicting - therefore, the film finally chooses to end in the intensification of contradictions. What's interesting is that this ending, this degree of intensification, is still full of petty bourgeois literary and artistic sentiments, which is essentially no different from the style of the three people before the film. The love is not extreme, the thought is not thorough, so it is not divorced from the audience, but it also loses its depth - so eroticism becomes the main impression.
Although the scene of the heroine Venus is indeed beautiful, that kind of beauty cannot be expressed by a heroine's dress alone. It is a cultural association and identity - so it should not be limited to the heroine's body itself.
Obviously I'm talking nonsense here. I lack the ability to appreciate movies in depth, especially I don't understand art.
View more about The Dreamers reviews
