What’s lost is not only Wen Ziren’s style, but also the brains of the screenwriter.

Erica 2021-12-20 08:01:05

Write a long review for the first time, but if there are differences in opinions, please forgive
me to cause spoilers and be cautious





.-------The dividing line of pretense-------- ---------

First of all, pick the eggs in the bones (what the hell) to analyze the advantages of this third part. In fact, it is only three if it is rough: there are many tribute points, the sound effects are bluffing, and the Elise trio (brain There

are quite a lot of eggs in tribute to the black squinting moon expression. The transvestite killer who did not expect to appear before, the old lady (yes, I will call him the old lady) and Carl in the second part both showed up, and the killer. Grandma and Elise's rivalry scene somehow even slightly explained the motive of strangling Elise immediately after the first possessed male protagonist; but when Elise confronted the killer grandma, there was a come on bitch, I really smiled unkindly... Really, the whole movie theater laughed (again to make up for the black squinting moon expression on its own). Then the sound effect, to be honest, may be because the sound effect of the movie theater itself is good, so every time a surprise appears, it can still bluff people. Yes, the big man who was sitting behind me and bringing the girl is there and can't stop shouting fuck and shit; but okay, the scenes where those ghosts suddenly appeared are really overused by various horror movies. It’s boring. Finally, the third point is, it’s a conscience plot to dig out how Elise and the two little followers got together. However, I can’t help but see the little Moxi dry head of the fat boy Tucker’s youth. I laughed (Yes, this prequel known as the darkest trilogy has so many funny elements. I also kneel down. After

tearing up the so-called advantages of these small details and bits and pieces, I started to spit out (umm)

The first thing that must be severely criticized is what the hell is going on with the plot! ! ! At first I heard that Wen Ziren was not directing, but when the new director was the first two screenwriters, I still felt hopeful that he would not tell the story badly, but after reading it, I really felt so boring... To apply a certain classic comment, the essence is all there. It's in the trailer, and the trailer itself isn't that awesome... spread it out. In fact, it can be seen that the new director wants to create a "turning and twisting" father-daughter relationship as much as possible. He has engaged in so many plump personalities of dead mother, naughty brother, careless dad, and neighbors of various colors, but the story is really telling. It’s too broken...it’s a slap in the face, and many interesting details have turned out to be useless and reluctant to lose (because the plot is completely pale because of the loss of the plot), and the actors (especially the heroine) ) The acting skills are really terrible, compared with the previous two... alas. So let me say, the head of the screenwriter is lost with Wen Ziren's style.

Yes, the absurd retro style that Wen Ziren's first two works hard to create is completely gone, replaced by the usual Hollywood horror film style, rotten skin and rotten villains, and cool visual effects. I don’t know why people who follow this series like Latent, but one of the reasons why I was drawn into the big pit by the first two movies that year was the absurd retro style created by Wen Ziren, the first one. It’s full of the style of the 1950s and 1960s, whether it’s a kid who suddenly changes from expressionless to crooked grinning, or the second perverted killer, his mother’s Victorian-style white costume and gothic makeup and hair. One important point not to be buried by other Hollywood horror films. Then grin? By the third movie, I couldn’t find the shadow at all. Even the classic and sudden title and music of the opening movie became boring characters flying in the air. I thought I was in a derivative movie of Harry Potter or Nolan Batman in an instant. ╮(╯_╰)╭

In short, what I want to say is that the third part of this prequel is considered from the perspective of plot and production. It has lost the capital that the series relies on to capture diehard fans, but it is not strong enough. If you hold up a worldview and become a mediocre work by everyone (no, ghost movies), you can also look at the value of the satisfaction brought by the previous work. (Well, of course, if you are purely looking for shock and excitement, then the Communist Party of China still has about a few minutes to do it.

View more about Insidious: Chapter 3 reviews

Extended Reading
  • Karlie 2021-12-20 08:01:05

    Sure enough, there was a change of director, not even a little bit worse. Obviously, it is not the same style as the first two. Wen's horror film does not rely on shocking close-ups to bluff people. The whole atmosphere is gloomy. This prequel looks much brighter, and the horror elements are more replaced by comedy elements. A mediocre work.

  • Amparo 2021-12-20 08:01:05

    Tired, tired, no comment

Insidious: Chapter 3 quotes

  • Lillith Brenner: [unheard] Quinn, do you remember...

  • Elise Rainier: Time spent in conversation is never wasted