Three and a half.
In fact, it is obvious that this is the same hypocrisy as Boccaccio criticizing the religion of man. I just want to know if we can find more value than just reading a story from hundreds of years ago, without the epochalism that is gone. The character design is like an online novel, but it just triggered our viewing request. His wife may be lacking a certain introduction. But the integrity of the story is guaranteed. Have you read it seriously, or have you only read the controversial parts of it. Oh my dear republic's censorship. The hymn is so paired with the absurd that it loops over and over again. When religion is alienated into a right, it is the sadness of true believers. There are also icons. The acting is pleasantly surprising. Yes, his madness reminds me of a lot of people who are sick people who have suffered long-term punishment. Including myself. Ink, wine, blood, shit, what a price one can pay to speak. Conflicts did arise, however. The love line is indeed a bit confusing. It is not the main line, but it has become the main flaw. Maybe I prefer the style of the stage play, the infinite amplification of emotions, and the beginning and end of the story.
View more about Quills reviews
