The male protagonist is a kind and pitiful person. Although he can't bear to blame him, his fate is indeed his own fault. I'm really a little dizzy when many people give high marks. I want to see the reason why they give full marks, but I can't find it. Is there something wrong with their expression or I can't understand it? I don't understand the possibility that the director's level is high. The audience thinks that it can get full marks. Why don't you tell others where it deserves full marks? Is it a bit unrealistic that every audience who gives full marks is so high level, so I hate it. Movie reviews that don't pretend to understand. I think this movie is really average. You can try to imagine that if there is no setting of this hand, only the part of the ordinary love story that attracts a little attention. Because of this hand, the level of this movie has been improved a little bit, just a little bit, after all, the plot is too ordinary. You can't say that this movie is a full score because your hands have their own ability to act, right? I believe that many people do not understand what the director wants to express after reading it. I think the director wants to discuss fate the most, because fate is the theme that runs through the entire film. Is what happened to the male protagonist determined by fate or his own fault? Extending my body out of the car indirectly led to the death of my parents in a car accident. I wanted to be a performer, but because of my father’s wishes, I wanted to be an astronaut. This shows that half-heartedness does not have a firm will. As a result, I grew up in a hurry to deliver fast food, and I listened to music to catch flies at work. His hand was cut off, finding a way to get close to the girl he liked, and finding a job he liked was the best of both worlds and a more natural way. It was indeed at an inappropriate time to confess and follow the truth, causing the girl to leave in anger. In fact, the unreliable character of the male protagonist is a little inherited. Before the car accident, the male protagonist's mother reminded the male protagonist's father once to look forward, but then the father made another mistake and caused the car accident. The correct way is to slow down Stop educating children. Later, the father saw the male protagonist catching flies and told the male protagonist how to catch flies. The education here is not right. Shouldn't the right thing to do is to tell a child that flies are dirty and can't be caught with their hands? The male protagonist's family education is also problematic, and the male protagonist cannot be completely blamed. So at the beginning I said that the male protagonist is kind and pitiful. In the end, it is not clear whether the male protagonist is dead or not. I don't like this kind of open ending. Originally, the plot of this movie is very ordinary. To have such an ending again is a bit tricky. That is to say, the director should make it clear whether the male lead is dead or not, but I really hate the way the director does not make it clear in order to make the movie more difficult to understand. The final conclusion is that this movie can only be said to be excellent, and you can have some thoughts after watching it. But those who give full marks, blind touts, say the best French animation of the decade, etc. exaggerate it
View more about I Lost My Body reviews
