The British have colonized India for two hundred years. Why don't Indians hate Britain? On the one hand, the British used India to rule India and governed by an affinity policy, and there were few violent repression incidents; on the other hand, the British actually helped India seize a lot of territory and promoted reunification; the British developed a lot of infrastructure such as railways, It can be said to benefit future generations; India's anti-colonial quest for independence was relatively peaceful, without war. So India is still a member of the Commonwealth of Nations. PS Taiwan was colonized by Japan for 50 years. Why do a considerable number of people in Taiwan have goodwill rather than hatred for Japan today? Something similar.
Therefore, the story of this film against the British colonists is not popular in India - mainstream audiences do not buy it, and this national sentiment is not sufficient.
Colonists and invaders are fundamentally different. And hatred is often the product of political propaganda. If a country leads its people to hate a country because of political needs, the national sentiment will tend to have a tendency to oppose it. There is also a market for film and television.
Open a brainless movie, the old man rides alone to save the young master, and the army retreats calmly, comparable to Zhao Zilong saving Adou; the heroine leads the team to attack the British warship, a bow and arrow is better than a sniper, and a There are many arrows (the heroine is so powerful that even the overlord Xiang Yu is willing to bow down). Is the bridge section of the hanging board war from Jackie Chan or Sammo Hung's movie? Anyway, I saw it in Hong Kong movies. The following naval battle is another Indian god-like opening. Indians still respect bows and arrows. "Baahubali: The Beginning" is also invincible with bows and arrows, but I don't see any outstanding achievements of Indian athletes in archery, but Koreans are really good, so they are in "Anshicheng" "He shot Tang Taizong blind in one eye.
How can a traditional Indian blockbuster be without singing and dancing? So after showing off her figure, the heroine immediately staged a sexy dance with the colonists, which is quite like a Korean girl group. In other words, the domestic girl group is also imitating and copying the ambiguous (erotic) dance moves of the Korean girl group, and the girl group will be delayed. Gotta get banned again. It's really boring to have a song and dance at every turn. It is suitable for Indian audiences to stretch the length of the film to nearly 3 hours. The international version is still about 2 hours.
Much of the dialogue is very didactic and childish. It's in my nature to deceive. Trust is my instinct.
The flashback to the old man is slightly redundant. Incitement is not the place.
Aamir Khan's ruffian hero image, what do you think of him in the copycat "Pirates of the Caribbean" Johnny Depp. In this play, India Andy Lau's limelight was crushed by the heroine and the old man.
View more about Thugs of Hindostan reviews
