The film is divided into three sections. The director started to use dramatic irony to make me think that the film narrative was limited to the actions of one protagonist like a regular movie. When the second section of the director used non-restrictive narratives, the action experience of other supporting actors also used the lens. When I recorded it, I knew I had been played with. This kind of narrative breaks the traditional narrative first, and does not repeat the act in the second, but its important significance lies in the reorganization of the sequence. The audience needs to recombine the movie time, because the first and second sections of the film overlap to form the same time and space, and the director uses a restricted narrative to divide the events of the same time and space into two paragraphs before and after. When the audience knows the logic and causality of the story after watching the two stories, the sequence reorganizes. The director also repeated the opening scenes of the three actions, deliberately comparing the three actions in parallel. In the first paragraph of "The Suspenseful Part of the Movie," the heroine was injured by a car and his life is uncertain. The director also restricted us to the heroine's actions. I don't know who hit the suspense. At the end of the second paragraph and the first paragraph, the director used to delay the event result to create suspense. Only in the third paragraph did he know the results of the two paragraphs.
View more about Go reviews
