When we watch the wilderness and dusk, we can regard them as ordinary Western movies, for a few dollars, for a few more dollars, but the English title of the film [Good, Evil, Ugly] suddenly mentions the subject of the film to human nature. At the level, even the last gun battle seems to have a symbolic atmosphere: three people representing good, evil and ugliness stand on three sides of a circular open space. This is not to say that the world is composed of these three kinds of people and is composed of these three kinds of people. Is it balanced? I think the starring role of this film is not Clint Eastwood, but an ugly actor. Although he is always a villain, but occasionally there will be true feelings. This is the role closest to the world. Unlike the previous two films, this film puts the time of the story in a specific era, but the first two films did not; this specific era is the Civil War. From the shooting point of view, it was able to shoot such a huge picture in the 1970s. There are really few war scenes in China (maybe I haven’t watched it). If war is included in the movie, then he is not simple: ordinary Western movies will not criticize war. , But the film described the war extremely tragically (Brandy said when watching the Battle of the Bridge: This is the most tragic scene I have ever seen. Even a bounty hunter who kills without blinking said so) and usually The tragic portrayal of war is generally anti-war (saving soldiers). An anti-war western film, a western film exploring human nature, it is none other than The Good, the Bad and the Good.
I also want to mention the soundtrack of this film, I actually heard it in The Lion King before-it shows his classic!
There are two kinds of people in the world: one who has seen westerns, and the other who has never seen westerns.
View more about
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly reviews
