Rich second generation PK poor second generation

Birdie 2021-10-19 09:49:25

Well, I admit it was to see Mickey Rourke, the villain whip man.
All science fiction/animation movies are incomplete without the villain. As the Joker in Batman said-You complete me.

The whip man Ivan (Ivan in Russian, so kind, sounds like), like every revenge man in Shakespeare's works, his image is sharp and unforgettable. As the father of a great scientist, he was expelled by the United States for the most shameful crime of espionage during the Cold War because of a conflict of interests. Suddenly one of the chief physicists in the United States became a prisoner to be sent back to cold Russia. In order to provide good medical conditions for his terminally ill father, Ivan, who was once a physicist, took risks and sold scientific and technological secrets and was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

Fifteen years is a big negative number in the life of any mature man, not to mention the scientific personnel who need good research conditions. Fifteen years of prison life has cut off Ivan’s chance to become an outstanding physicist and destroyed it. His personal happiness. In the golden age when the Iron Man monopolized the American science and technology military products, Ivan could only be seen on the small TV in prison, looking up at him surrounded by fame and surrounded by beautiful women.

Family feud is a kind of inherent injustice. The only difference between a poor dad and a rich dad may be a big opportunity. And the resulting influence is enough to cause a weapon of mass destruction like the whip man. Only in the face of vast knowledge, the poor second generation and the rich second generation are equal; the cleverness of the whip man is to use the time of other poor second generations to complain about the world, specializing in physics with the same starting point as the iron man, so that The two have a fair chance to compete on an index, and they have achieved themselves.

In the doomsday sentiments of the rich second-generation Iron Man, he used the mansion to soak up beautiful women and exchanged his reputation for worship. And the deep depression in my heart cannot be compensated with money: the lack of fatherly love, the separation of friendship, the alienation of lovers; the iron man has been placed in the same dark corner as the whip man. As a result, two seemingly disparity in status always feel that heroes cherish heroes when they meet each other. The Iron Man saw the power source of the Whip Man’s copycat version and asked him in prison: "With your knowledge, you can sell it to merchants, countries, and anyone. Why do you want to die?"

The whip man was silent and laughed. In the rich second-generation world of the iron man, the standard of success is to conquer the world with money and reputation, high-profile, teasing others, and self-righteousness are all his privileges. In the poor second-generation world, the affirmed sense of accomplishment is a rare product. To put it vulgarly, everyone has different values ​​and cannot communicate. The Iron Man wouldn’t want to understand why the Whip Man chose to destroy himself, why he didn’t directly use nuclear weapons in the final PK to destroy all mankind, and why didn’t the Whip Man hug right and left like him and spend his life with good wine and food?

The iron man has great love, although there is not much left in the second part; the
whip man has a big hatred, and compared with the iron man, he is focused, independent and persistent. He didn't want to hurt all mankind, even though he has such abilities and opportunities; maybe it is because Russia has a good humanistic environment and did not force the little goodness in the hearts of the poor second generation to fly ashes. Fantasy in another social environment, an environment where the rich and the poor are used as a measure of human nature, what will the whip man be like?
--------------------------------------------------

Briefly explain why I wrote a 3-star film. In fact, I really don't like this one. Compared with the first one, the story and the smoothness are greatly reduced. I don't like it at all. Writing about the whip man is completely sentimental. There are always self-righteous people around who are always moving like "Isn't it just money?" "If you have money, you can do it". Facing them, I feel so powerless and powerless. Are you all mentally handicapped? ? Can you understand other people? Did your money buy shit and pour it in your head? So weak. . .

-------------------------------------------------- -

Mickey Rourke goes on in the 1980s and unruly handsome face, each one read, "love your nine weeks and a half," the people can not forget. I suggest everyone to take a look.

View more about Iron Man 2 reviews

Extended Reading
  • Hester 2022-04-24 07:01:02

    More and more dazzling visual effects, but the plot is not as progressive as 1. The gigantic villain, Iron Man, who appeared at the end was too unbeatable. He was defeated within two minutes of his appearance~ And the point is that he didn't fight to the death at the moment of his death~ If he fell down, he fell down... PS can't figure out what role his bird played in this film from beginning to end. .

  • Emerson 2021-10-20 18:58:35

    I have a fanfare of foreign science fiction movies, and the biggest feeling after watching it is cool. The special effects are simply not comparable in China, and they are even better than the first one.

Iron Man 2 quotes

  • Ivan Vanko: Hey, Tony. Before you go, palladium in the chest, painful way to die.

    [after a moment's pause, Tony leaves; Vanko chortles to himself]

  • Tony Stark: She's right. The party's over. Then again, the party was over for me, like, an hour and a half ago. The after party starts in fifteen minutes.

    [under his breath]

    Tony Stark: And if anybody, Pepper, doesn't like it, there's the door.

    [accidentally fires his repulsar]