Very good, after exploding Doraemon

Ettie 2022-01-06 08:02:33

Full spoilers!
Including spoilers "Doraemon: Walk with Me"!
Very good, better than expected. This kind of three-dimensional animation deliberately produces two-dimensional effects. I don’t know the technical difficulties. Is it because of the cost or to approach the style of two-dimensional animation. The story of the dog pilot added in the middle feels a bit unnecessary and not well presented. If it is handled well, it is worth keeping. The story of the main line Charlie Brown is very well told and complete, and the details of the plot are also particularly interesting. It is a simple child's perspective but has a certain connotation theme. The portrayal of the feeling of love is in place. The little red-haired girl does make people feel very beautiful, although only the simple way of showing the audience only to the back, it is just right.
Charlie Brown is a character I like very much. This is what I feel when watching the CCTV dubbing version. I also think the other roles are well shaped. For example, Linus, a good friend of real people, always reminds people of Ron; for example, Mint, a carefree female man; for example, Sally, is a very typical sister image; Lucy and Malfoy are like a little bit of a petty character. The other character was very successful, and there are many works that make people like it. The only thing I can think of is the "Harry Potter" series. These two textbooks can indeed be used as personal textbooks.
Speaking of Charlie Brown, I have to mention two characters of the same type-Nobita and Xiao Maruko. When I was a child, I watched the two classic animes "Doraemon" and "Chibi Maruko". At that time, I disliked the two characters of Nobita and Maruko very much. I felt that Nobita was so cowardly and Maruko was always a little bit "cheap". . Later, when I grew up, I gradually understood that Xiaowanzi’s "small and cheap" is a normal nature of children, and because of this "small and cheap", Xiaowanzi's role is very vivid and three-dimensional, and all Xiaowanzi tells are true stories. , I gradually accepted the role of Chibi Maruko and recognized that "Chibi Maruko" is an excellent work. However, I still hate the role of Nobita very much and don't approve the work of "Doraemon". The protagonist Charlie Brown and Nobita in "Peanuts" are very similar, both are losers, but the difference is also obvious. Charlie Brown has bad talent and bad luck. The most important thing is his lack of self-confidence. This is very detailed, such as being very shy when facing people he likes. In addition to bad talent and bad luck, Nobita has too many other evils. For example, the most typical laziness; such as not being independent-super dependent psychology, the Cantonese version of Nobita’s mantra "Doraemon, please save me!" is still born in the ears; for example, not making progress-the whole life is just In order to pursue Bai Fumei, there are no other goals; cowardice, such as facing difficulties and fat tigers. There is not much portrayal of the positive image of Nobita, saying that Nobita is kind, I really haven't felt it after watching so many episodes of "Doraemon". Charlie Brown at least saw his sister's performance mess up and would sacrifice himself to come forward. At least he had a small life goal of "I hope everyone likes myself". The reason why Shizuka agreed to marry Nobita was only because he was "worried that he would mess up without Nobita," what a forcible protagonist aura. Charlie Brown sacrificed his carefully prepared program for his sister, and honestly confessed to the honor that did not belong to him, but he only got the approval of the goddess. In addition, I also think that other characters in "Doraemon" have failed. The fat tiger is barbaric, the husband is despicable, Shizuka is a beautiful but unreal character, Iduki Sugi is an excellent boy, but the author's original intention is to treat him Portrayed as a villain, so it’s a bit deliberately outlier . Feeling that the author can't control a certain high-level idea, he bluntly belittles Izuki Sugi. In comparison, the role of "Chibi Maruko" is not only richer, but also more three-dimensional. Such as the virtuous girlfriend Xiaoyu, the rich and handsome Hua Lun classmate, the funny gossip boyfriend Punzhi, the official bookworm squad leader, the nympho daughter Meiling and so on. Xiao Maruko's family roles are also very lively. It is worthy of being a work based on real stories. Xiao Maruko is also a textbook designed by people. In comparison, the role of "Doraemon" is pitiful and monotonous. It is just a work that relies on Doraemon to sell cute and magic weapons. I don't like it very much.
Another thing that can be compared with "Peanuts" is that Charlie Brown and Nobita are both protagonists, both losers, and they have a very anthropomorphic animal friend (a cat and a dog) around them. But Doraemon is a strong supporting role, often directly used as a clue to the development of the plot (such as the universal magic weapon Dafa). But Snoopy is not so strong, but will advance the plot, mainly relying on Charlie Brown, and even often troubles, more like a friend who makes suggestions. From their names "Doraemon" and "The Peanuts Movie" and previous series named after Charlie Brown, it can be seen that Snoopy's setting is not as critical as Doraemon. I prefer Snoopy This kind of feeling, in addition, Doraemon's violent temper sometimes makes people dislike this character. In addition, "Peanuts Comics" has many short stories about other characters, but "Doraemon" does not, which further makes people feel that the characters of "Peanuts Comics" are more three-dimensional. To be honest, there are no likable characters in Doraemon. Will the audience like Fat Tiger Husband? Or Nobita? The attitude towards weaker characters is also completely different. The sister of Fat Tiger in "Doraemon" is only used as the object of ridicule, as the opposite of Shizuka (Bai Fumi), and it is the person Nobita wants to avoid becoming a partner. The Sloppy King in "The Peanuts Movie" has obvious shortcomings and hates, but some people like it—"It doesn't matter if a bit of soil is a little bit of soil". It seems that the author wants to convey the idea of ​​caring for the weak.
"Doraemon: Walk with Me" as a movie that summarizes the main plot of "Doraemon" has already exposed its essence.
After pulling so much, I finally complained about "Doraemon", and it didn't feel very good. I'm going to brush the "Peanuts Comic" series when I have time.
Rating 8.2

View more about The Peanuts Movie reviews

Extended Reading
  • Russ 2022-03-21 09:02:37

    Saw myself in charlie brown...but my ears hurt

  • Alexys 2022-04-22 07:01:42

    Although the main theme is very clever (compared to Kung Fu Panda 3), although the values ​​are slightly simpler, the characters are distinct, and there are constant small surprises, comparable to Shaun the Sheep. The flat 3D mode is used to express the sense of comics, and the black and white comics inserted in the middle bring nostalgia. This is the main theme type I love, and I offer my full love for the Peanuts series

The Peanuts Movie quotes

  • [Peppermint Patty is seen snoring loudly with her head back on Marcie's desk]

    Peppermint Patty: Zzzzzz...

    Marcie: Sir?

    Peppermint Patty: Zzzzzz...

    Marcie: Sir?

    [she pushes Peppermint Patty's head forward, but it falls back on Marcie's desk. Peppermint Patty is still fast asleep]

    Peppermint Patty: Zzzzzz...

    Marcie: Sir!

    [she pushes Peppermint Patty's head forward again, this time hitting her own desk, waking her up]

    Peppermint Patty: Two! No, three!

    [turns to Marcie]

    Peppermint Patty: Was I close?

    Marcie: Class hasn't started yet, sir

  • Peppermint Patty: Chuck, are you trying to trying to hold my hand, you sly dog?