The above is a serious statement, and a less serious statement is that such a decadent version is ruined, and it is really to blame Conan Doyle for mentioning Holmes' drug use. Drug use in the Victorian era was not commensurate with the taste of modern drug use, which directly led to the decline of Holmes' status to marginalized people in the post-modern era.
The new version of Watson has become fierce and smart, but his loyalty to Holmes has never changed, which is gratifying and, of course, even more ambiguous. This kind of dubious partnership intimacy is actually not being brought up now, let alone the rotten woman. It's just that the same ambiguous relationship that has been mentioned by everyone, the description of the beginning of the 21st century and the 20th century and even the 19th century are not the same.
Black Wood directly reminded me of Anne Rice’s years of vampires, but he was relieved to see that the ultimate boss is still the same as Professor Moriarty for thousands of years. Obviously, Guy Ritchie can be derived from this. Numerous sequels-as long as Fuchs can be a hit.
The biggest favorite of the new version is that everything is playing with a new feeling, but there are traces of the original work everywhere. The adaptation is to make you feel that he really knows a lot of the original work, so it can avoid all possible imitations, but deliberately in the details. It has kept a certain originality, so it looks very tacit. The second creation is originally American, but it is also a bit nostalgic, so I won't pick it.
As far as the story is concerned, there is really nothing to say about the content, but it fits Conan Doyle’s old industrial atmosphere where science and ignorance coexist. It can even be said that it brings a bit of story feeling that Conan Doyle might write-- Except for Sherlock Holmes's attachment complex.
221B Baker Street, which did not exist at all, is still cordial every time I look at it. The room in the new version is unprecedentedly decadent and messy. You know it's messy in the original book, but at least you can find the tobacco in the slippers and the letter under the folding knife. You know it's a nest, it's a good one to live in. Not a slum of drug addicts like they are now. As for why I changed from a den to a slum—that’s because Watson was about to get married, so Holmes’ angered strike and self-rejection—even when I, a rotten girl, actually saw Fuchs crawling around. The wind was also messed up, which made me finally find that apart from corruption, there is actually a bit of integrity.
The first "Study of the Words of Blood", which pays tribute to Whistler, mentioned "our" dog, and then it mysteriously disappeared. Perhaps this mysterious dog is the first time among so many Sherlock Holmes works. It really appeared, and it is rare to carry forward. Its whereabouts was once one of the disputes of Fuchs fans. Maybe Guy Ritchie finally gave this answer. Another detail that is often overlooked by other versions is that Fuchs likes to patriotically engage in shooting sports in the room, and Guy Ritchie finally gave it a little bit of use.
What excites me is the moment when the two men in top hat and black dress are sitting on the carriage. Mi is wrong. From the preconceptions of domestic illustrations to the classics of JB, Chinese Fuchs fans are probably more accustomed to such a attired Sherlock Holmes, yes. The goodwill of this suit is far better than that of the safari version-although Jr. Downey's Fuchs is far less elegant and gentlemanly. But at that moment, there was a real feeling.
In the first unsuccessful version of the "Blood Letters Study" illustrations, there is a picture of Holmes holding a test tube and Watson for the first time, which was ridiculed by the comments: WS men with a smile are about to go to the gay club. It can be seen that it cannot be said that the “noble” Victorian style will not be reserved for the rumors of two single men, but Fuchs’s “spiritual partner” has Irene who has (almost) defeated him, and Watson also I have been married at least once (ranging from 1-3 marriages), so I don’t have to worry about teaching the kids badly. As a vase cover, the new version of the two women can block the mouths of the people, but in the movie it also fully reflects their status as a protective cover in front of their real partners.
Irene's story goes beyond Holmes, and there is the intersection of Poirot and the countess in Christie's writings, and Irene is set as Moriarty's work, and there are some shadows of "Four Devils". Black's hanging story also originated from another very famous detective story, but it was a pity that it was too young to read it, and I can't remember who it was.
Holmes and Watson's analysis of the dwarf pocket watch is the original analysis of the legacy of Watson's brother. I am very happy that Holmes has not forgotten his brother, including the small villa. Fowler's boxing ability was carried forward in the movie, but his skill in sticks was given to Watson.
I like the movie’s arrangement for Lestrit. This small-minded official who has always been relatively unsightly about Sherlock Holmes and has to rely on Sherlock Holmes still stood on the side of Sherlock Holmes at the critical moment. This old combination of cooperation and opponents, after all, has a strong The strong taste of human affection, compared with the desperate police and detective relationship described by Chandler, the British are still full of tolerant humanity.
Oh, and finally, don’t forget the musical arrangement of the violin in the movie. It is a spoof innovation that is absolutely unified with the original film adaptation.
Although this movie is really "corrupt", it is still a bit sad if you only see Corruption. You can only say that Corruption is Guy. Ritchie gives a spoof of the relationship between Holmes and Watson that has existed since ancient times. The theme is still It lies in the cynical attitude he wants. In fact, if it weren’t for the two uncles Jude Law and Downey Jr. to play and replace the two young scallions, then the motive is really not pure if it is to sell rotten or spoof, but at least—for now—there is something else. Look.
View more about Sherlock Holmes reviews
