Twelve citizens from different positions, different environments, and even different ages gathered together as a jury for a case. Each of them has different opinions and suggestions on the case. Everyone insists on their own words but wants to unify the results. Therefore, a court trial that looks like a Shura field has begun. Who is right, who is the most just, how to unify, and how to think dialectically? It's full of highlights, and the discussion and understanding can't help but make people astounded!
I like this movie very much. The thinking logic and dialectical thinking of 12 people all reflect a problem angle. Have we broken through the limits of this thinking when we look at the problem?
View more about 12 Angry Men reviews