Dialectics and Unity

Carmella 2021-10-19 09:55:11

Twelve citizens from different positions, different environments, and even different ages gathered together as a jury for a case. Each of them has different opinions and suggestions on the case. Everyone insists on their own words but wants to unify the results. Therefore, a court trial that looks like a Shura field has begun. Who is right, who is the most just, how to unify, and how to think dialectically? It's full of highlights, and the discussion and understanding can't help but make people astounded!

I like this movie very much. The thinking logic and dialectical thinking of 12 people all reflect a problem angle. Have we broken through the limits of this thinking when we look at the problem?

View more about 12 Angry Men reviews

Extended Reading
  • Kaelyn 2021-10-20 18:59:37

    This is called a typical drama

  • Hal 2021-10-20 18:59:29

    The plot unfolds well, but what Davis advocates are only ambiguous speculations. In fact, after verifying these things one by one, the child may or may not be the murderer. It's just that the prosecution's initial work has not been done well, and the defense's cross-examination has not been done well. The case should be investigated again, rather than a simple verdict of not guilty. I am honored to see someone taking a screenshot quoting this short commentary 11 years ago as the representative of the vulgar masses. What I want to add now is that the dereliction of duty by the authority is one thing, and there is nothing wrong with reasonable questioning, but there is something wrong with the final verdict of not guilty. Because whether the masses speculate blindly from the agency or the male protagonist blindly, they are just crushed. The literary and artistic youth criticized me for pursuing the truth and vulgarity, so as long as it is contrary to the organization's point of view, is it fair and just to accept the innocence?

12 Angry Men quotes

  • Juror #8: Let me ask you this: Do you really think the boy'd shout out a thing like that so the whole neighborhood could hear him? I don't think so - he's much too bright for that.

    Juror #10: Bright? He's a common ignorant slob. He don't even speak good English.

    Juror #11: [who has a foreign accent] He *doesn't* speak good English.

  • Juror #8: Has anyone have any idea hwo long it would take an el-

    [sees Jurors 3 and 12 playing Tic Tac Toe on a piece of scratch paper. He rushes over and takes away the sheet of paper]

    Juror #3: Hey!

    Juror #8: This isn't a game.