If all 12 people voted guilty at the beginning, then what is the point of going on!
I probably understand the meaning of the jury. To put it bluntly, it is democracy! Even if you are guilty, as long as there is an objection from a jury member, you will be sentenced to an unsettled case even if the final result is not obtained. Then, do you have to find evidence again?
From the first vote of innocence to 12 votes all passed, it was a sweat! The members of the jury should be more rational than perceptual! But at first, I didn't seem to care except for those who didn't vote. I just wanted to end early! It seems that this person is guilty of the worst, or does it matter to him? Some people are busy watching football games, some people sell directly at the jury table, some people have prejudice against the children who come out of the slums themselves, and some people directly graft the relationship with their sons to this matter!
When the details were slowly revealed in front of everyone, some people doubted it, and some still thought it was irrelevant, even a little ridiculous! And what kind of emotions do these people look at this matter with! What is the meaning of the jury's discussion if you just blindly believe the witness's testimony!
Except for the one who was busy watching the game, everyone else has re-examined this murder case! Even the one with a particularly loud voice! He finally shredded the prejudice!
View more about 12 Angry Men reviews
