Liao Kang
"Anonymous" Anonymous was staged, I told my friends to go see how they slander Shakespeare. Only after watching the movie did I know that they dare not only slander Shakespeare, but also slander Queen Elizabeth of England. Who is that? That's not Queen Elizabeth II, who is declining in Britain today. In front of Lao Sha, that was the king of British history-Elizabeth I. Britain began to dominate the world from her. The Columbia Film Company of the United States really dare to change people. Through the mouth of a favorite, the Queen of England is described as a girl who has missed. It was not enough to say that she had a son at the age of sixteen. She also said that she had a good relationship with this illegitimate child and gave birth to another son. Even if the ignorant is not guilty, it is a god punishment! To the Queen, this youngest son is her son and her grandson. To the eldest son, the younger son is both his son and his younger brother. The film stupefied that this unlucky straight lady is the true author of Shakespeare's great works. That is to slander the United Kingdom, anyway, Britain and the United States are connected to each other. If China is so slanderous and the Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty and Sima Qian are changed, then the Third World War will not break out? But I know it's slander, it's a random story. When I was watching a movie, I really let them go in. The loopholes I knew were blocked by them. I have to admire the screenwriter and director. This fake play is done as if it were real. Movies are the art of making fakes come true. Didn’t the director of this film also direct a catastrophe film "2012" in the first two years? Whether the end of the earth predicted by the Mayans is true or false, we will see the difference next year. But were those dramas written by Shakespeare? This kind of thing, the older you get, the more you can't figure it out.
What do you say? Let me tell you this. When Shakespeare was alive, no one doubted that he did not write those 37 plays, 154 Shang Lai poems and two long poems. Not only that, but no one doubted him more than one hundred and fifty years after his death. It was not until he became recognized as the best writer in Britain that no one started to mention the issue of Shakespeare's copyright. That's really suspicion for snobbery. Look at their so-called reasons: Shaman has not studied much, it is impossible to quote so many allusions, and it is impossible to know so many historical events; Shaman has never seen royal palace nobles. , It’s impossible to understand their conversation and style; Father Sha’s signature looks like a ghost drawing, not like the handwriting of a great writer; Sha’s girl is illiterate, and there is one who can’t even sign. Education; Shakespeare’s writing has no documented records, he did not leave manuscripts, no calligraphy, and did not write anything about himself.
That said, those works were not written by Shakespeare, who are they? Oops, there are different opinions. There are more than 70 candidates, all for their own reasons: some have killed people and have to be incognito; some have been spies and have lived abroad for many years; some are in high positions. Cannot reveal identity. In short, they are all highly educated masters, but they have unspeakable concealment. As a last resort, they gave up the copyright to this Hongfu Qitian Sha boy, and he became famous. This movie is even more wicked, stupefied to mix up the intrigue of succession to the throne with Shakespeare's theatrical performance. Flashback once in a while, that's messy. If you are not familiar with that period of British history, you may not really understand it. Let me give you a hint. The one who appeared first and was hunted down was Ben Jonson, who later became a great writer. Why catch him and torture him? The movie flashed back, flashbacks that Edward, the Earl of Oxford, gave him his wonderful play and asked him to give it to the theater company to perform in his name. Ben Jongsheng was quite upright, he didn't do this kind of fame and fortune. As a result, a ruffian named Shakespeare picked up a bargain and impersonated the author. Since then, the plays written by Edward have been performed in the name of Shakespeare.
The earl of Oxford refused to let the audience know that he was the author of the script, not only because he could not reveal his noble status, but also because his play satirized the queen’s favored courtiers on the stage and tried to incite the audience to come to the monarch’s side. Use drama to recall the old relationship between him and the queen, because he can't let the incest incident be exposed. At this time, the queen is very old, and succession to the throne is an urgent issue. The old lady still has a little tenderness in her heart, and the movie often flashes back to her relationship with Edward when she was young. Don't be surprised that the old lady and the girl look so similar, that is not the credit of the makeup artist, they are played by the mother and daughter. Edward Earl of Oxford’s youth and his prime were played by the same person. That aristocratic demeanor, those deep eyes, really have nothing to say. The actor's name is weird-Rhys Ifans, I have never heard of this kid. His superb performance is amazing and makes people believe that the person who can write the masterpieces of Shakespeare should be the respect and style of Edward, the Earl of Oxford.
But don't be convinced. Scholars who study Shakespeare all agree that those immortal masterpieces were written by such a hillbilly. According to British law, Shah must have gone to elementary school. Their local elementary school teachers are top students who graduated from Oxford University. That year, they didn't learn anything else, they learned grammar, rhetoric, Latin, Greek, and history. Ben Jonson said that Lao Sha "does not know much in Latin, and less in Greek". It depends on whom you compare. Compared with the talented college writers of his time, Lao Sha is almost, but compared with today's classical literature professors, he is not inferior at all. At least people can read classical originals. However, it is precisely because he is not good at classical literature that he made some mistakes when citing the classics. University talents such as Marlowe would not make such mistakes. But Shakespeare's talent is not here. His language use ranges from vulgar to elegant, including refurbishing many common sayings and proverbs, that life, that liveliness, those noble lords and university talents can't write it. Shakespeare’s genius lies in his insight into life, understanding of human nature, familiarity with personnel, calm observation of the world, and enthusiastic concern for history; Shakespeare’s talent lies in his wonderful and reasonable storytelling, and in his atmosphere. Doing whatever he wants lies in his extraordinary skill in shaping his character and in his ability to reveal the psychology at his fingertips. None of this can be learned in the classroom, but a genius. His talents are different from those of the talented playwrights at the university. He never followed the ancient Greek and Roman writers, writing scripts according to the rules of the trinity, but boldly and innovatively, just like his Shang Lai poems, not following the same steps. The earth studies Petrarch and Spencer, but created Shakespearean style.
Besides, Shakespeare’s contemporaries are not like we are today, locked in their own homes and offices all day long and never interacting with each other. People often drink and chat together, discuss art and politics. At that time, no matter whether his friends or opponents, no one suspected that it was the script written by Lao Sha. Instead, many people mentioned his creation. Ben Jonson, who later became the first poet laureate in British history, was the hapless man in the movie. He and Lao Sha were both rivals and friends. He often had a drink and talk in the Wild Boar’s Tavern. It is estimated that Lao Sha paid the bill. More time. After all, they are the first to be famous, and they are the shareholders of the theater, which is considered a big money among those art guys. Moreover, seven years after Shakespeare's death, this Ben Joan had itchy hands—where did he dare to love the seven-year itch—he wrote a long poem to commemorate Shakespeare. By the way, the widely quoted saying that Lao Sha "does not know much in Latin, and less in Greek" is from that poem. But that's a foil. If you read the whole poem once--it's too long, I can't attract it, so just reprint it for you--you know how he praised Shakespeare. Oops, that's nothing but ancient and modern English, just Lao Sha! The masters of ancient Greece and Rome who imitated them are all town. As I watched the movie, I wondered that the screenwriter and director could not have known this long poem. It was the first written commentary that established Shakespeare’s literary status. You say that Ben Jonson knows the truth, and you say that he and Shakespeare are deadly enemies. I'm going to see how you explain how he wrote this poem so emotionally. Hey! The film stunned that Edward, the Earl of Oxford, on his deathbed told him to never reveal this secret. If you really think his play is well written, praise Nasha. Look at this hole, tightly closed.
This hole is plugged, and there are many other holes. Ben Jongson is not the only one who knows Lao Sha. Even if he put Shakespeare in front when he published those scripts, covering up for Edward. But no one in the world questioned such a big secret? When my brother was studying in the UK, he studied Shakespeare's Shang Lai poems. The first one hundred and twenty-six capitals are dedicated to his benefactor, a handsome young man. Oh, look at him, like a god. Continue to persuade him to marry, so that his beauty and talent will be passed on forever. The author and his benefactor also had a little awkwardness, because the handsome guy flirted with the author's girlfriend, and then the two of them got together again. This kind of intimacy has made some critics think that Lao Sha has a habit of breaking sleeves, so it makes a big fuss. If the author of those Shang Lai poems is Edward Earl of Oxford, does he need a benefactor? It's pretty much for him to be the benefactor of others. Moreover, from 1987 to 2010, several scholars who doubted Shakespeare’s copyright made detailed computerized stylistic analysis of his works, and compared them with the existing works of thirty-seven possible authors. This also includes Letters from Sir Edward Sirius. And guess what? Shakespeare’s style of writing is self-contained, and the language of several Shakespeare plays after Sir Edward’s death has changed, which is a result of changes in stage equipment. So those plays cannot be written by Edward. These skeptics finally changed their views and bowed to Shakespeare's feet.
Of course, the narrator in the movie will not tell you these things. Movies are art, entertainment, and they don’t always show the truth. As long as it can justify itself, make you feel invulnerable when watching the film, and believe it, it will do. When the boredom is relieved, and when you are happy, you can work together. Don't sullen your face all day, like Plato, insist on driving art out of his ideal country. It's not like protesting for a movie, or fighting a world war or something. Who made Shakespeare and Elizabeth I so famous? Isn’t it enough to make working people around the world happy? Attached
on November 5, 2011
• Joan Seng's poem "In
Memory of Shakespeare" To the Memory of My Beloved the Author, Mr. William Shakespeare and What He Hath Left Us
by Ben Jonson in the First Folio, 1623
To draw no envy, Shakespeare, on thy name,
Am I thus ample to thy book and fame;
While I confess thy writings to be such
As neither man nor Muse can praise too
much.'Tis true, and all men's suffrage. But these ways
Were not the paths I meant unto thy praise;
For seeliest Ignorance on these may light,
Which, when it sounds at best, but echoes right;
Or blind Affection, which doth ne'er advance
The truth, but gropes and urgeth all by chance;
Or crafty Malice might pretend this praise,
And think to ruin where it seem'd to raise.
These are as some infamous bawd or whore
Should praise a matron. What could hurt her more?
But thou art proof against them, and, indeed,
Above the ill-fortune of them, or the need.
I, therefore, will begin. Soul of the age!
The applause, delight, the wonder of our stage,
My Shakespeare, rise ! I will not lodge thee by
Chaucer, or Spenser, or bid Beaumont lie
A little further, to make thee a room:
Thou art a monument without a tomb,
And art alive still, while thy book doth live,
And we have wits to read, and praise to give.
That I not mix thee so, my brain excuses;
I mean, with great but disproportion'd Muses.
For, if I thought my judgment were of years,
I should commit thee, surely, with thy peers .
And tell how far thou didst our Lyly outshine,
Or sporting Kyd, or Marlowe's mighty line.
And though thou hadst small Latin and less Greek,
From thence, to honour thee, I would not seek
For names; but call forth thund'ring Aeschylus,
Euripides, and Sophocles to us,
Paccuvius, Accius, him of Cordova dead
To life again, to hear thy buskin tread
And shake a stage; or when thy socks were on,
Leave thee alone, for the comparison
Of all that insolent Greece or haughty Rome
Sent forth; or since did from their ashes come.
Triumph, my Britain! Thou hast one to show
To whom all scenes of Europe homage owe.
He was not of an age, but for all time!
And all the Muses still were in their prime,
When, like Apollo, he came forth to warm
Our ears, or, like a Mercury, to charm.
Nature herself was proud of his designs,
And joy'd to wear the dressing of his lines,
Which were so richly spun, and woven so fit
As, since, she will vouchsafe no other wit.
The merry Greek, tart Aristophanes,
Neat Terence, witty Plautus, now not please;
But antiquated and deserted lie,
As they were not of Nature's family.
Yet must I not give Nature all! Thy art,
My gentle Shakespeare, must enjoy a part.
For though the Poet's matter Nature be
His art doth give the fashion. And that he
Who casts to write a living line, must sweat
(Such as thine are), and strike the second heat
Upon the Muses' anvil, turn the same
(And himself with it), that he thinks to frame;
Or for the laurel he may gain a scorn!
For a good Poet's made as well as born;
And such wert thou! Look how the father's face
Lives in his issue; even so, the race
Of Shakespeare's mind and manners brightly shines
In his well-turnèd and true-filèd lines;
In each of which he seems to shake a lance
As brandish'd at the eyes of Ignorance.
Sweet Swan of Avon! what a sight it were
To see thee in our water yet appear,
And make those flights upon the banks of Thames
That so did take Eliza, and our James!
But stay, I see thee in the hemisphere
Advanc'd, and made a constellation there!
Shine forth, thou star of poets, and with rage
Or influence, chide, or cheer the drooping stage;
Which since thy flight from hence hath mourn'd like night,
And despairs day, but for thy volume's light.
View more about Anonymous reviews
