Beep the doge, there is a typo in the title...Edit by the way, add something 20160327
There is a group of photos in the film, on which are the traffickers branded by the master, and the four photos read:
Judges and
juries
sentence people to
justice?
My first reaction at the time was "Guardians of the Galaxy" villain Ronan. When I checked the information, I saw an interview saying (it seems that Li Peisi said it myself, I can’t remember it): "He is both the judge and the Punish people." But when we saw that he decided to destroy the entire planet, we felt that he was a tyrant, and what did the planet and nation hinder you? It must be annihilated...
Previously, Zhadao said in an interview: "We believe that Batman represents justice because the authors told us that. We first saw someone robbed of their wallet on the street, and then saw Batman rush out. Fat beats the robber, so we believe that Batman is punishing evil and promoting good, but if the first message is removed, we will only see Batman beating people. "In
this case, is he still justice?
Bruce Wayne said no, we have always been criminals.
The opposite of night is day.
The opposite of Batman is Superman.
Batman first believed that Gotham belonged to him, so he was obligated to shoot for Gotham, and he didn't mind making his hands extremely dirty for this.
Superman is different. Superman is an outsider. All his efforts are hoping that he can become a resident of the earth. It really just feels that the greater the ability, the greater the responsibility—he is just kind.
Ben Affleck said in an interview (too lazy to read the original words so to the effect): Clark is a reporter, he feels his duty is to reveal the truth; Bruce is a rich man, he is used to not being bound by rules. Therefore, the personality, standpoint and occupation of these two people are all related.
But everyone understands the contradiction between Da Chao and the master, and people who don’t understand probably don’t care...
I am more concerned about Lex Luther. Basically in the film reviews or afterthoughts I have seen, his evaluation is not high. Either the role is too weak or the performance is too much, but I really like it. Jesse's version of Luther! !
I always believe that the villain does not have to be strong, not necessarily a big boss. The point is to poke out the contradictions and make the whole show look good. Although the design of Luther’s kidnapping of Martha is a bit silly, but aside this point, Jesse's version of Luther's character is completely tenable.
Jessie has a line to explain why he doesn't believe in Superman or God, because when he was abused by his father in childhood, there was no god to save him, so god can't be all good. And Superman was the god of salvation all the time in the hearts of the people at the time. Look at the reactions of the people in the scene on the Day of the Dead in Mexico-hey, this is all the mess left by 007. As a result, Superman came to wipe the ass of the British agents. Really annoying-to the public, Superman did not show any dark side, everything is just our guess, so we can temporarily determine that he is all good. Then Luther is unhappy. Since he is all good, he can't be god. I just want to tear up his hypocritical mask and tell you that he will also kill for his own self-interest (Master's first level).
To put it bluntly, Luther passed his desire for revenge to Superman. He wants to prove that Superman is not an angel, but a demon. (It may be a bit over-interpreted. I think in a sense, the logic that Luther wants to instill in the people is that although Superman appears to be an angel, falling from the sky, in fact he is a demon that will bring people destruction, because from hope to The desperate fall is more painful than the process of struggling to survive without having hoped in the first place.)
btw, please tell me that the painting in Luther’s office is "fallen sky" or similar, because someone has to argue with me that it is Ika Los...
----------------------------------------------
From the U.S. premiere to the zero-point field in China, I have heard too many polarizing comments along the way. Anyway, personally, when I first watched it, I felt that the foreplay was so long and I didn’t live it, but it was really burnt and beaten afterwards. After the end, it dragged off again. I already mastered the rhythm when I watched it the second time. Then I started to observe the details carefully. After two and a half hours, I was not tired at all. I really liked it... Of course I wouldn’t say it was. A good movie, but whether the movie itself is good, whether it is popular with the public, and whether we like it or not is actually not inconsistent.
Many people say that the director is over this time. While repeating himself, the plot and rhythm are completely unreliable director, but I think instead of analyzing what kind of director Zach Schneider is, it is better to discuss what he is. What kind of person, when the interview talked about the classification system, he told a story: "At that time, I was showing "300" to everyone in Hall H of the comic exhibition, and then someone discussed with me whether I could not show the trailer because there were children present. , I was in a hurry at the time, who would bring children to the show! Manga is a very serious thing!”
Let’s enter the theme and pull up the story line. Basically, each independent segment is a scene.