The reason why the story of Coriolanus has not been taken seriously in later generations is that the cancer of pagan culture in it has not been fully demonstrated. In a postmodern way, this Shakespearean play is at best in line with the will to power in the German left nihilism Nietzsche. Nietzsche himself is also a second-rate philosopher, so the status of this play can be described as deserved, and there is nothing to be ignored or underestimated.
The polytheistic system in Northern Europe was the fuse that directly led to the collapse of Greece and Rome. When a person can say that he believes in Mars, the god of war, when he looks back and can find Jupiter to preside over justice, it is essentially the so-called ``move the dragon gate''. Look at the polytheistic system and there are not many peoples normal, and the arrogance of Coriolanus is Even the gods and Buddhas in the sky can not actually make him awe, because in a polytheistic system culture it is impossible to produce truth. In layman's terms, it is impossible to produce any certainty. A society without certainty is unsound. The people and noble monks or any class cannot be healthy.
The proletariat and intellectuals who poisoned Coriolanus are indeed not worthy of any kindness. Discussing their behavior and purpose is just a waste of life and time. But Coriolanus himself is a big problem, and everything he feared in his mouth was finally despised by him. On the surface, his life is full of noble principles, but in the end all his principles are destroyed because of the unlimited expansion of the arrogance in original sin, and he becomes a dragon. The dragon slaughter the evil dog is difficult in the eyes of the proletariat and intellectuals. The distinction between right and wrong is black and white, but in the eyes of the bourgeois, nobles, and monks cultivated by the monotheistic system, the dragons and evil dogs should not be saved. Shakespeare is not at all popular in the high-end dramas of Christian and Catholic countries (serving the nobility and the bourgeoisie).
View more about Coriolanus reviews
