Respect your opinions, and my brother also talks about my opinions

Torrey 2022-01-13 08:04:18

Respect everyone’s views, and my brother also said what should I

say about my views ?... Let’s talk about my personal perception from the economy! The

term economy, to put it bluntly, is a free market mechanism, which is free trading,

so we use Money buys any "resources" we need,

and...food-clothing-housing-traveling-education-happiness, etc., can be said to be all, composed of resources, which

means that all people in life need everything. Spending money, so money is so important!

However, when everything in life cannot escape money, people try their best to make money

and are born from all walks of life, from the exploitation of natural resources to the processing of resources, which is later marketing. ,

There are a lot of human and material inputs, but when profit is shared...

No, some people pay more and others pay less, but because some people hold the so-called resource ownership,

it divides more. And this resource ownership is the source of all unfairness...

because in a country-to-country world...resources should belong to all the people of the country, or the whole mankind, and should not be owned by a few people.

For example, A Niu’s parents left him 100 acres of land, A Niu took A Jiao, and A Jiao’s family also gave A Jiao 100 acres of land. The couple had a total of 200 acres of land. They gave birth to a son, A Shui. After the couple died He left 200 acres of land for Ashui. Ashui hired agricultural workers, Atu, to help plant the land. Ashui made a trip to the mountains and water, and Atu buried and worked hard. After the harvest, Ashui made a profit of 100,000, and Atu only got a salary of 20,000. He paid back I have to pay for the rent and the expenses of my wife and children. I can’t save money for a lifetime. In the end, I left without leaving anything for my children. Is that right?

A rich man like Ah Shui took out his extra money and bought one yuan for 500,000. To build a land, another 500,000 yuan was spent to build a house, and then 100,000 tens of yuan was spent to invite officials to build a park nearby, and then abruptly speculated and sold for another 5 million yuan. However, the housing prices in the vicinity also rose. The more I can't afford it, I can only live by renting a house after I get it, but I can never save money to buy a house, right?

If all the land in this world will be owned by a small number of people in the future, then I would regret to say that if there is an afterlife, Ah Shui will rent a house with his descendants in his previous life.

If money appears
http: //www.chiculture.net/0901/html/c01/0901c01.html
is to facilitate people's calculation and exchange. At this stage, it should be terminated, because gold can only be mined in a few places, and it is limited. .. More importantly, human beings will not die without gold, so what is the value of items? Time is money. Time is fair, so I think time is the standard to measure the value of all goods...

If It is said that the land was occupied by the ancestors without equal distribution. At this stage, it is time to redistribute, because the resources of the land are limited, and everyone should have a piece of land of the same size and belonging to ( Home), and cannot be sold, only exchange locations. Normally speaking, it is to return to the country (earth) after death.

Some people say that the Venus project will become a tyranny...
My opinion is that if it can be framed by true democracy Covering socialism, the Venus plan will not be possible to turn into a tyranny,
but "people" cannot rely on technology alone to use nothing
but a fairer way to allocate everyone’s time to work. but the premise that everything must be completely transparent, and all kinds of reforms by way of an internet poll of voting
representative politics (at this stage of governments), is a fake democracy
because the vote elect 100 people, this is a 100 People have a sense of identity at the moment. That is an act of democratic illusion. So letting these 100 people vote on a plan that affects 100 million people is shallow and dangerous, because... when these people are bought... threatened... Lure.. Instigate.. Instigate, the wrong decision made afterwards... is definitely not what these 100 million people want. Can it not be chaotic?

(Taiwan, for example)
Asking 113 people to vote on a destiny that affects 23 million people is as untrustworthy as one person to vote for a destiny that affects 23 million people. Because 20 million people vote for you, it does not mean that he agrees with any decisions you make later. .... If every decision affects 20 million people, then every time it should be decided by 20 million people. It was not possible in the past because there was no internet, and the present and the future are not necessarily the same...

There are still many ideas.... go out first... and talk about it when you have time

View more about Zeitgeist: Addendum reviews

Extended Reading
  • Elbert 2022-04-23 07:03:48

    The essence of financial social system

  • Dayana 2022-03-25 09:01:18

    God stick please go away

Zeitgeist: Addendum quotes

  • Narrator: Being wrong is erroneously associated with failure, when, in fact, to be proven wrong should be celebrated, for it elevates someone to a new level of understanding.

  • Narrator: Our outmoded social systems have broken apart. It's time to claim the unity and work together to create a sustainable global society, where everyone is taken care of and everyone is truly free.