I was shocked by Ah San's movie again and again again and again

Jamil 2022-01-17 08:01:31

In 1998, I watched Ah San's movie "The Enmity of Fire" for the first time in a university cinema, and exclaimed with my companions. I still have a deep memory! After that, I no longer have the experience of watching Indian movies in the theater, and occasionally good movies are downloaded to the small screen of the computer to see, and there is no such shock as in the theater. Now, just mention the Indian movies that I watched with my friends back then, they are all incomparable. Sorry, quite nostalgic. The quality of some Bollywood movies is long and varied, which also affects my very few notes in recent years. However, recently in various movie news, I found that everyone had a high opinion of this Bollywood movie, and I followed my 15-inch screen with the attitude of trying it out: I am God, it’s so beautiful! Lingling heroine, gorgeous costumes, exquisite choreography, no-cost setting, gorgeous photography...I think this film is simply a horrible thing not to watch I-MAX in the cinema! Of course, compared with Hollywood special effects, the war scenes of Empire Shuangbi can only be of passing level, but this does not affect the gorgeous tone of the whole film. After all, this film still tells a good story without obvious flaws in the plot. In general, this movie suits my taste very well. If it can be introduced, I will definitely call a good partner, and then go to the theater to brush up the sorrowful feeling!
Post a few screenshots, I hope it won’t be spoiled



View more about Bajirao Mastani reviews

Extended Reading
  • Hillary 2022-03-22 09:02:38

    I feel that the director's three views are really incomprehensible, and a junior is so righteous. Can love hurt others unscrupulously?

  • Donnell 2022-03-19 09:01:07

    The beauty, scenes, costumes, music, singing and dancing, and props are all beautiful enough to break through the sky. (PS: The characters in the film are true and pure in history. The female protagonist is a Muslim and the male protagonist is a Brahmin. The social background at the time was that Muslim and Hindu intermarriage was a taboo. The king married a few centuries ago. A concubine, that’s normal too. It’s a bit inappropriate for some people to use modern people’s concept of love to measure ancient people.