The essence of this film is to intermodulate the genders of men and women under the overall background of the patriarchal society. People who complain about "power worship" don't need to use this as a slot. This is exactly the purpose of the movie. The patriarchy of our society is not aimed at the physical gender, but the social gender, which has nothing to do with whether you are physically male or female. So the place where the male protagonist travels is still a patriarchal society, but the male role recognized in this society is played by a physical female. Therefore, women giving birth or similar settings make me feel that it is not a slot point, but a place to shine. Because we can therefore find that the social remarks about what can't be done because of the inherent physiological characteristics of women are completely excuses. After the male protagonist passes through, because of the influence of the surrounding environment, it has become feminine as we define it. Therefore, in today's society, it is a very hooligan thing to blindly ask for personal changes without first changing the atmosphere of public opinion. In summary, the two societies presented in the film are essentially the same. The film uses our habits of one and our discomfort with the other to reflect the mocking of the current violence in the definition of a powerful society, and defines the society with pure physical gender. Gender is a very stupid thing, and our diversity as humans should not be limited to such a framework.
View more about I Am Not an Easy Man reviews
