because I couldn’t understand Russian. The earliest version I found
was pure dialogue like the man from earth, and the scene was also very simple. The low production cost movie was
because of the first version. The man I watched has undoubtedly given some guidance (drama) to the way of this movie, and the viewing effect has been reduced, but it will not affect the impact of this movie on me. It is a rare and brilliant.
The elimination method used in the film to throw away a few doubts is a bit unexciting (compared to pure reasoning, suspenseful), not all of them are proved by impeccable logic, and even some of the votes are just psychological homogeneity. I agree with the changes made,
but it is reasonable. For each clue to be non-obtrusive, it is also quite hard.
Don’t talk about the “nonsense” that makes up the number of words. It is also reasonable to say that other
China has always followed the path of the mean. There is nothing wrong. More inclusive. But with the roots of the trend, most people are portrayed like a template, and there are not many people who want to say no to all voices different from you and stick to it. Moreover, the result of such hard work is not good or bad for me at all, just like the lines in the movie.
Someone wants to end early because of personal interests (the ball game), hoping to vote hastily,
but the world needs idealists (male protagonists) after all.
There is also a need to question this kind of selfish selfishness. In
recent years, it has always been seen in the news that the principle of no suspicion has been re-emphasized, and judicial approval is lifelong. The hope is effective and implemented, rather than going through the scenes.
This is the United States in 1957
had to admit that we have a gap with the United States at that time (just talk about the judicial system and this sense of responsibility, and the national identity feels that every one Actually)
Watching talk show in American dramas, one of the most unbelievable concepts at the beginning is that
The host said: "Your efforts have made this world a better place." I am not as nauseous as reading "Voting Rights", but a touch
of small-cost movies that touched China or making purely dialogue movies. The
pictures are so beautiful. I dare not imagine that I
have never doubted the IQ and creativity of Chinese private capital, but the relaxation of supervision allows everyone to truly participate in it, make the best use of everything, and generate a true sense of national pride, responsibility, and no fear of exposing the ugliness to independent media. , Make corrections with an humility, do not be arrogant and self-satisfied.
Even though the door is closed and sometimes complains,
when foreign friends ask me what I think about China’s development in the past few years,
they will still answer: I believe everything is getting better. But for unreasonable things, such as being walled, there is really nothing you can do
View more about 12 Angry Men reviews
