Movie review, absolutely control IT, don't mess with "technical house"

Nelle 2022-01-17 08:03:50

"Love House and Wu", perhaps that is the case, my preference for actor Pierce Brosnan has exceeded my appreciation of his acting skills. From the debut of "Remington Steele" to the well-known "Around the World in Eighty Days", to the 007 series, Pierce Brosnan has matured step by step and ushered in the peak of his career.

However, with the passing of the peak, Pierce has also fallen into the vicious circle of receiving bad movies. The "bad movie" mentioned here does not mean that his acting skills are not good, but the connotation of the movie he starred in and the audience's feedback is not good. It feels like Nicolas Cage and Bruce Willis are starting to follow in the footsteps, which is a pity.

The "IT" introduced today, Pierce's latest movie, still seems to be unable to get rid of the embarrassment of the hero's twilight, and once again starred in the bad movie, but as a brain fan, I should take a look first before making a judgment.

The film is about the aviation tycoon, "Gao Fu Shuai" Mike Regan and the "perverted" IT "love and hatred", and finally get a happy ending, hastily. Throughout this film, there are a lot of bugs. It is speculated that the screenwriter and director are not paying enough attention to the film. To be precise, they have not properly considered the structure of the plot and the rationality of the story, and they have a tendency to perfuse the audience.

Next, follow the old handsome guy to see the logical error of the film
1. Mike gave a presentation in front of the client, but the computer went down and he had to ask the company's part-time workers to fix it? This is definitely a whimsical idea. For such an important meeting, the computer can't work? strangeness. The most amazing thing is that you don't even call professional formal employees to repair? What kind of bloody logic of "zero-time work"?

2. The plot continues to be bloody, Mike encounters Ed (IT male) and directly invites him to help him repair the network? This millionaire is so stingy, why not hire professionals? Like "China Telecom"? Didn't this deliberately lead the wolf into the room?

3. Ed used a computer to perfectly invade Mike's smart home. Mike's counterattack is hand-to-hand? Why don't you find the police uncle? Don't the rich have many insiders and bodyguards? The logic of mental retardation

4. Mike finally took action and found a scavenger (to cure the network problem), and his first suggestion was to get rid of the smart home system. Orz, do you still use this? All fools know, can't it just cut off the power supply? Why kill this system? Underestimate the audience's IQ

5. I believe that the most confusing time for the director's mind is near the end. Mike enters Ed's residence alone, steals the USB flash drive, and puts on a hood? Who is the messenger of justice? Buddy is completely drunk

Written at the end, Pierce Brosnan participated in a bad film with excellent acting skills. The whole film is like chicken ribs---the food is tasteless, and it is a pity to discard it. The content of the story is easy to guess (the perverted IT is soaring all the way, and 007 is simply not in the eyes), there is no ups and downs of the crime plot, only the flat narrative, the plot is dry, the style of the standard bad movie.

Of course, the film conveys an eternal truth, that is, don't mess with the "technical house".

Not recommended, unless it is the old guy Pierce Brosnan brain residual powder

Details critics + stills starting to "floyd and helen trip highlights", thank you

View more about I.T. reviews

Extended Reading
  • Rachael 2022-03-25 09:01:19

    The picture is as gloomy as the plot

  • America 2022-04-22 07:01:48

    This is IT idiot phobia.

I.T. quotes

  • Mike Regan: Should we be doing this?

    Ed Porter: No