Tactical issues

Saul 2022-01-21 08:02:03

After T34 rushed out of the concentration camp/barracks, it was like walking in the courtyard, parking to pick up girls, plundering in the square, and refueling at the gas station. Why didn't a German soldier or a vehicle follow?

Even if the Germans don't understand why the T34 has shells, it doesn't have a machine gun egg. You can send a car to follow it, hit the track if you have the opportunity, and report your whereabouts at any time if you don't have a chance.

I don’t believe that there are officers who order soldiers to rush up to the tanks, or do they dare not listen? This is not on the battlefield, or in the German sphere of influence. The surroundings are all their own, hiding from tanks and guns.

Even if the Germans were dumbfounded at the time, would they be able to recover after half an hour? Then send a convoy to conduct a large-scale search. According to the T34's top speed of 75 kilometers per hour (this is the road speed, not the obstacle crossing speed), how far can it travel in half an hour?

If there is a car stuck to the T34, it shouldn’t be too difficult to deploy gun positions in advance to intercept it, right?

One possibility is that the German anti-tank weapons were not deployed (or equipped) together with the tank units, which resulted in no suitable anti-tank weapons even though there were tank units on the scene.

but

Later, I saw a gun (I don't recognize the model) mounted on the highway to intercept the T34, and forced the T34 off the highway to go uphill. It must not be a firecracker or a gunfire that can force the T34 off the highway.

So it's not the lack of weapons, but the command.

Also, I haven't been on the battlefield, but I also know that tanks are afraid of fire (the soldiers at the time of World War II should know this better?), shouldn't it be difficult to keep up with setting fire? Even if you can’t put it on fire, you can destroy the sight and sight device and turn it into a blind person, right? Even if it does nothing, armed soldiers follow it, can it cheer on it?

Okay, a movie~

View more about T-34 reviews

Extended Reading
  • Gwendolyn 2022-03-27 09:01:20

    The literary drama can be completely ignored. In other words, when the protagonists are driving T-34 tanks, it is the most exciting moment of the movie. Inside the tank, there are four bloody soldiers with clear division of labor. Their roars echoed and stirred in the narrow space, stirring the atmosphere to the top; from the outside, this behemoth looked like a "little swan" dancing ballet, without any Clumsy, free to go. The tank battle between the two armies is the most exciting. The cool and warm colors symbolize the two opposing sides. The slow motion and fast editing create a tense and exciting atmosphere. There are not too many fancy skills, and the effect is simple and direct. In fact, tanks are also a man's romance.

  • Sanford 2022-03-26 09:01:12

    The "Call of Duty" version of "World of Tanks", Slavic mixed with Hollywood flavors, made tank films as romantic as aerial combat films. Photography captures light and shadow very well, but the art texture is more game-like. The military advisor of this film is actually "Fury" military advisor Kevin Farrell, a former U.S. Army armored commander and director of military history at West Point. But the older 1965 version of "T-34" is more similar to "Fury," with less dramatic elements and more gloomy realistic scenes and narrative. Without commenting too much on the technical details, just read it as a comic.

T-34 quotes

  • [after the T-34 crashes through the Nazi officers' car park]

    Ionov: What was that?

    Demyan Volchok: Expensive German cars!

    Stepan Vasilyonok: They were!