Very provocative and out of context:

I'm not against women being successful, I'm not against women working outside the home, that's their choice, I'm against a small elite group that demeans housewives. Feminists like to say that they are committed to choice, but if you dare to choose stay-at-home mom, then you must have something wrong, if you don't feel enslaved, then you are either stupid or ignorant, the women's liberation movement is basically a kind of Very negative attitude towards life, it tells women: "Sister, form is not good for you! You wake up in the morning and can't find a job, even if there is, it's a garbage job, even if it's a good job, you can't get promoted, And if you get married, your husband treats you like a servant, and marriage is a lot of dirty diapers and dirty dishes." They also slander us in the media and want to use our great constitution to create a neutral society, with this so called Affirmative Amendment, which means that little girl will also be doing military service in the future, which is not at all. U.S. A woman is the main caregiver in the family. If you push women into the workplace, women will find themselves working two full-time jobs, they will be tired and unhappy, and they will feel that they can't do either. Well, ultimately choosing not to have children, maybe that's what the liberals are for, after all, they see Gloria Steinem as a hero, a woman in her late 40s who is single and childless, but her pain is tragic. Let them flock to her, she wants to solve the problems of her life by creating laws, that's why liberals want us happy married women to become resentful, they want us to join this sisterhood, suffer with them.

View more about Mrs. America reviews

A word from Phyllis

Ariane 2022-12-25 21:26:37

Extended Reading

Mrs. America short comments

Lavonne 2022-04-19 09:03:21

Women's rights are not equal rights. Some rights cannot be equalized in the first place, and some things do not need to be humble enough to say that we are equal rights to men. ^^
Lavonne 2022-04-22 07:02:01

Revisiting the historical node in which left-wing feminism was counterattacked by the right-wing, on the one hand, it shows that the left-wing liberals in the late 1970s were “not monolithic”—when they made great progress by virtue of identity politics, there were not only many disputes within them, and it was impossible to unify the priorities of the agenda. , vulnerable to becoming a vassal of partisan politics, and suffering from ignorance of conservative opponents when socioeconomic conditions do not provide a basis for their claims. It may still be useful for us to reflect on identity politics today. On the other hand, it reveals the inherent antinomy among right-wing conservatives (anti-ERA): the more actively this group of women advocates their own ideas, the more they are developing in the direction of becoming feminists. This is particularly evident with Schlafly. Perhaps it makes us more curious about why they insist on building a family-centered conservatism myth, because of the long-standing system? or something else? At the end, Schlafly, who tried to advance into the cabinet with the help of a set of political "philosophies" she believes in, still can only peel apples in the kitchen. I wonder if she has not realized the importance of radical ideas to establish alternative political solutions? Even a little.