The dark continent is so low

This sequel is completely off topic, it is no longer a question of whether there are special effects. The monsters in Monsters (2010) are still a foil. Even the background is not counted. It takes seconds to calculate and the interaction is extremely poor. If you delete all the shots, you won't feel anything wrong. . The director is completely using the platform to vent the humanistic feelings of war. It is better to take a serious shot. It was thankless and tossed for a full two hours. The director made the anti-American and anti-war sentiment into a movie, but most people can't interpret him. the meaning of. Monsters are like native Arabic culture and Islamic beliefs. No monsters trampled on humans in the film, but only the killing of monsters by the US military. I thought the director wanted to highlight the cruelty of war with the background of the end times, until the school bus. The suppression of local cultural beliefs ultimately suffers only from civilians. The little monster flying out of the iron box directly metaphors that the style of belief has been integrated into this nih land. After the death of the monster, it turns into spores and spreads all over the land, which can be regarded as a religious letter.

View more about Monsters: Dark Continent reviews