You guessed the process, but you guessed the ending wrong

As the first Olympic bid this year, <3:10 to Yuma> should have won (meaning I am optimistic about the taste of the judges). Russell Crowe occupies half of the screen, dedicating his best performance since "Beautiful Mind" and reading almost all the brilliant dialogues in the film. A turbulent and reckless person who kills and overturns goods, has a righteous and evil character-it is not only different from a villain who walks to the dark one by one, nor is it an anti-hero who subverts traditions. The first half of the film is moving smoothly, and the women who sometimes show people with green leaves tell you that this is a man's play.

Men's westerns, then I will wait for the traditional revenge ending. Regrettably, although the ending is not in line with my common sense, it is also too innovative, and the sudden and dramatic changes in the protagonist’s character make people caught off guard. Even if there was some performance in the front, there was more water and noodles. There were always similar weights on the left and right trays. At the end, the left side was suddenly cleared and the right side became infinity. If you are tolerant enough, you can interpret it as forgiveness, redemption, return of humanity, etc.; otherwise, I am afraid we will come to this conclusion: the crew sleepwalking hand in hand at the end.

View more about 3:10 to Yuma reviews