Listen a little every day and take notes

Allie 2022-10-11 05:57:45

Day 1 (5min) did my best. . . Hearing is limited, corrections are welcome

The problem for us is not are our desires satisfied or not. The problem is how do we know what we desire. There's nothing spontaneous, nothing natural about human desires. Our desires are artificial. We have to be taught to desire. Film is the utmost well art. It doesn't give what you desire. It tells you how to desire.

What we get in this wonderful clip from Possessed is common story on the magic art of cinema within a movie. We can watch a working class girl living in a dark small village, what a sudden, she found in a situation while the magic cinema experience . She approaches the rail. The train is passing and it is as if what reality is, just a person standing near a slowly passing train turns into a viewer observing the magic of the screen.

We get a very real ordinary scene onto which the heroine's inner space has been better in a fun space is projected, so that although all reality is simply there, the train, the girl, part of reality in her perception in the all of your perception is edgely well alleviated to the magic level, become a scene of her dream . this is cinematic art in its viewers.

But the choice between the blue and the red pill is not really a choice between illusion and reality. Of course, The Matrix is ​​a machine full of fictions. But this art fiction which already struck our reality. If you take away from our reality, the symbolic fictions that regulate you lose reality itself. I want a third pill. So what is the third pill. Definitely not some kind of transcendent pill which enables a fake fast food religion experience but a pill that would enable me to perceive not the reality behind, the illusion, but the reality in illusion itself. If something gets too dramatic, too violent, even too fit in its enjoyment, it shed us upon the cognition of our reality we have to fictionalise it.

View more about The Pervert's Guide to Cinema reviews

Extended Reading

Top cast

The Pervert's Guide to Cinema quotes

  • Slavoj Zizek: There is an old Gnostic theory that our world was not perfectly created, that the god who created our world was an idiot who bungled the job, so that our world is a half-finished creation. There are voids, openings, gaps. It's not fully real, fully constituted. In the wonderful scene in the last instalment of the Alien saga, Alien Resurrection, when Ripley, the cloned Ripley, enters a mysterious room, she encounters the previous failed version of herself, of cloning herself. Just a horrified creature, a small foetus-like entity, then more developed forms. Finally, a creature which almost looks like her, but her limbs are like that of the monster. This means that all the time our previous alternate embodiments, what we might have been but are not, that these alternate versions of ourselves are haunting us. That's the ontological view of reality that we get here, as if it's an unfinished universe. This is, I think, a very modern feeling. It is through such ontology of unfinished reality that cinema became a truly modern art.

  • Slavoj Zizek: Joseph Stalin's favourite cinematic genre were musicals. Not only Hollywood musicals, but also Soviet musicals. There was a whole series of so-called kolkhoz musicals. Why? We should find this strange, Stalin who personifies communist austerity, terror and musicals. The answer again is the psychoanalytic notion of superego. Superego is not only excessive terror, unconditional injunction, demand of utter sacrifice, but at the same time, obscenity, laughter. And it is Sergei Eisenstein's genius to guess at this link. In his last film, which is a coded portrait of the Stalin era, Ivan the Terrible: Part 2, which because of all this was immediately prohibited. In the unique scene towards the end of the film, we see the Czar, Ivan, throwing a party, amusing himself, with his so-called Oprichniki, his private guards, who were used to torture and kill his enemies, his, if you want, KGB, secret police, are seen performing a musical. An obscene musical, which tells precisely the story about killing the rich boyars, Ivan's main enemies. So terror itself is staged as a musical. Now, what has all this to do with the reality of political terror? Isn't this just art, imagination? No. Not only were the political show trials in Moscow in the mid- and late-1930s theatrical performances, we should not forget this, they were well staged, rehearsed and so on. Even more, there is, horrible as it may sound, something comical about them. The horror was so ruthless that the victims, those who had to confess and demand death penalty for themselves and so on, were deprived of the minimum of their dignity, so that they behaved as puppets, they engaged in dialogues which really sound like out of Alice in Wonderland. They behaved as persons from a cartoon.