Can this kind of film and television works be less?

Alvina 2022-01-23 08:08:06

This is a very sad phenomenon. A large part of our phenomenon-level film and television series are adapted from plagiarism works, such as "Zhen Huan", "Three Lives III, Ten Miles of Peach Blossom", "A Thousand Bone Flowers", and this movie. .

I have two sad things:

One is the scarcity of excellent scripts, making film and television adaptations need to focus on third-rate plagiarism novels. Is it ridiculous?

Second, as a member of the cultural industry, the film and television team does not know that it respects originality, loses sensitivity to infringement, supports plagiarism, and helps to abuse, making original creation more difficult, leading to a lack of excellent works and a vicious circle.

So should the efforts and achievements made on the basis of plagiarism work be affirmed?

I don't think it should be affirmed. This is a mistake from beginning to end. Just like you foul in a game, no matter how good your results are, you will be zeroed out. If your score is affirmed, it is equivalent to supporting a foul.

Plagiarism is a foul in literary and artistic creation, and it has seriously blasphemed the efforts of other original creators. It should be nailed to the stigma of literary and artistic creation, and the derivatives of plagiarism are also not eligible to enter the market.

This is the principle and the bottom line, and it must be relentlessly applied across the board, without exception.

Just imagine, if someone copied something I’ve worked so hard to create and published it without changing the soup, then someone would pay for the copyright and adapt his work into a movie. It was a big success, and all the audiences praised it. How do I feel about this movie that is copied from my stuff? Do I doubt this world, why does the original creator's deserved thing fall on the plagiarism? Why is no one accusing them of not? Why did everyone forget about plagiarism if they were copied well? Then why should I go original? Isn't it good for me to copy like him? Anyway, if you copy it well, no one will say me, and you can get fame and fortune, so easy.

Why should I be original?

Why go to original?

Because I have a bottom line, I have the dignity as a creator.

I don't want to peek at other people for 100 points in the test. When I was young, my parents taught me that other people’s things should not be taken casually. At the same time, I cannot buy the stolen goods for my own use, otherwise I will be an accomplice.

Why am I so angry?

How did I learn from my predecessors and peers? I read it over and over again, picking out the plot they wrote wonderfully, taking notes, thinking about why this plot is outstanding? What kind of experience does this character need to lead to his current words and deeds? I have been thinking and studying over and over again, and now there are people with two or three books on the table. The outline is first written according to this one, and the outline is written according to that one, and then the outline is converted into that one, without thinking about it. That's it. There is another team that ignores its despicable origin, buys its copyright, and uses all its hard work and sweat to whitewash such a book. Does this team know what they are doing?

He can completely recreate a script on the same subject himself, or buy the copyright of the original work and adapt it. Why should he affirm a plagiarism novel?

The most paradoxical thing in the whole process is that the film criticizes campus bullying, but the film itself leads the audience to bully all original creators.

It is so shameful.

View more about Better Days reviews

Extended Reading

Better Days quotes

  • Chen Nian: Can you protect me? I don't have money to pay you.