When I read it, I remembered that I had read a novel when I was a child. To be fair, the plot of the story is relatively flat, I feel that the adaptation is not very good, and I feel that there is a kind of downplay-the plot, the characterization, etc., are probably an adapted HE story outline.
It is not meant to be criticized. In relation to the time background of 1939, the above evaluation is quite a bit of the arrogance of the modern self-righteous people who read countless movie viewers. It’s just that the little princess in my memory is richer than this story, and the villain portrays more brilliantly. Maybe the comparison will be a bit disappointing?
I must thank the filmmakers for the quality restoration and recoloring of this film. When I watched it, I didn't think it was an old movie from 1939. Non-members of Blow My Xiao Po Station can also watch high-definition color quality.
Fu Hua Dao is really beautiful. It belongs to that era, with the beauty of a fuzzy oil painting. The female teacher is really beautiful and temperament (I am shameless?), and the outfits are also very beautiful.
I won’t mention the cuteness of Templer. Everyone knows that compared to her cuteness, the little princess’s elegance (polite) and strength are more impressive. The movie he is quite good, and the impression that the Central Plains novel is a be.
It has completed the mission of a fairy tale, making girls yearn for a strong, optimistic, polite, and lovely little princess, which is very good.
If you are interested, go to see the original work? The plot of the characters will be fuller.
above.
View more about The Little Princess reviews
