Arnold, who is infinitely favored by Cannes, seems to have too many distracted thoughts in the creation of this film. The 4:3 frame ratio and the interpretation of Heathcliff by a black actor all show her distracting thoughts. eyeball. Because these two methods did not better narrate or express emotions, they were just presented there in embarrassment. If it is said that the 4:3 frame ratio is accompanied by handheld photography and natural light to highlight the roughness, I am afraid that the post-grading and such modern handhelds do not agree with 4:3. The black interpretation of Heathcliff is even more embarrassing. How can the prominent Linden family agree and accept Isabella to marry him?
However, Arnold’s talent should not be underestimated. The harsh natural landscape of the protagonist’s boyhood was presented extremely moving, like the emotions of the two, and it reminded me of André Tesini’s "Blanc "Sisters", Arnold seems to have also been inspired by this film.
On horseback, a group of close-ups of childhood and childhood teenagers and girls with fine hair, horseback, horsehair, and boy's hands are very moving and extremely sexy.
The two were playing roughly in the mud. Heathcliff smeared black mud on Casey's face and body. At that moment, even though the external movements were rough, there was an unspeakable joy.
In the second half, Heathcliff and Casey, who have returned as adults, are also bathed in light and color, but in the charming light and color, they no longer see the touching smiles of the two under the gray sky. This counter-use is also moving. .
It just regretted Arnold's distracting thoughts, regretted her unchanging response to ever-changing.
View more about Wuthering Heights reviews