Not to mention domestic films. The main theme blockbuster of American imperialism has also become more and more loyal to the party and patriotism in recent years, but after all, it is understandable. At this point, some people still insist that Western movies do not promote values. Well, look at "Frankenstein's Army".
Just look at the first half. The swearing is not worth mentioning.
Loot the villages in your own country.
Beat the people of your own country.
Torture the prisoners.
Strongly beat the female prisoner to death.
The comrades-in-arms fought for power and turned against each other.
Discrimination and exclusion of foreign comrades-in-arms and foreign comrades-in-arms.
The comrades-in-arms were slaughtered and could not be saved.
By the way, Stalin will be black again.
Of course, from a historical perspective, I also admit that the Soviet Red Army committed some crimes in World War II. The situations listed above have probably all appeared in real history.
The problem is that if a team of less than 10 people can do all these things in two days, what a shadow of their childhood! ! !
What is a "significant typical person". What is "advanced typical deeds". What is meant by "derived from life above life".
The Central Propaganda Department is still broken in Tucson!
In fact, as long as the Soviet army appears in Western World War II movies, it is almost impossible to be positive. This is already an iron rule. From "Armed Under the City" to the most recent "Allied Treasures", it was black for 10 minutes if it appeared for 10 minutes, and it was black for two hours if it appeared for two hours. And almost every slot can be attributed to "institutional problems."
Of course, it is impossible to expect the Soviets to jump out of a high-volume male protagonist at a critical moment like the heroic Americans to turn the tide and maintain world peace. Even "Armed Under the City" didn't do it—the little sniper was just a little sniper after all. After destroying the German ace spear god, his comrades in arms will still die in vain because of "system problems".
So before I watched "Stalingrad" for the first time, although I didn't know anything about the film, I saw it at the beginning and knew that it must have been filmed in Russia. American film talents will not live so much Lei Feng.
Pulling away. As for other aspects of the movie itself. . . The classic, romantic, aesthetic, subtle, sophisticated, and freedom that steampunk should have in my mind are all ruined by the plasma full of screens. If you like steampunk, go and watch "Captain Sky and Tomorrowland" or "League of Gentlemen" again.
If there are any highlights in the movie, the subject itself still excites me. When World War II encountered science fiction, I was really a little excited to think about it. At least it is a good exploration. If it can be made into a pure mainstream science fiction film, I believe it will be very promising if it is well received. The twists and turns of the plot are not bad, the procrastination and DV style in the first half are a bit boring, but the climax in the second half is quite real. Except for "the director let you die, you must die if you die; the director won't let you die, and you won't die if you die", there is nothing wrong with the overall plot, and the logic in the film is quite self-consistent.
Finally: As a sci-fi fan, the word "nonsense" in the title is not aimed at the movie subject itself, but only shows the distance between the movie and the real history. Hereby explain.
View more about Frankenstein's Army reviews
