James Bond finally came down from the altar. There is no Aston Martin, no dazzling gadgets, Sony Ericsson is used on the mobile phone, and Toshiba is the original one. Without the compelling handsomeness, the decent gentleman's demeanor, and the shirt that would never crease in a fight, this 007 is more and more like Bruce Willis in Die Hard, especially at the airport. The section where the molecule was killed by his own explosive is simply a reprint. 007 will be caught and tortured-a trick that most people can't think of. 007 is still the superhero in enduring pain. The Bond girl will die, and the two women who appeared in 007's work will eventually die, although the second death is a bit far-fetched. 007's figure is the focus that all the comments agree. Although he doesn't look good, he is basically a strong handsome guy. The killing machine, which is a bit stale, does not kill women externally, but depends on connotation and sincerity. hehe. My understanding is that this series of films is now undergoing a transformation, and the primary goal is to cut costs. That's why there is such a 007, which is similar to the prequel film. Of course there are still big scenes, such as sinking a building in Venice, but in general, compared with the previous ones, the handwriting is much smaller. The script is also more compact, and the plot continues to the end. Although there are still some far-fetched points, the overall style is much closer to the audience than the previous luxurious and more formal style. Another point is that this film is not the kind of film that can find all the bad guys all at once, so it's played to the end. This civilian 007 succeeded in transformation, but apart from some iconic logos, it fell into the same type of film as Die Hard or Berne. If so, it may lose the advantages of the series and no brand effect. I don’t know if Paramount’s executives have any concerns while making money and laughing.
View more about Casino Royale reviews
