—————————————————————
The third revision
When Jack and the screw were about to freeze to death on the cold ice, Jack's handsome face suddenly took on an exaggerated anthropomorphic appearance. Do you think it's funny and scary? 111
1⃣️At present, some viewers are entangled in point 1: You are a 3D live-action animated film, how can the expression not be as exaggerated as the original 2D animation? Like some movies, they still retain innovative elements on the basis of realism. If you Disney do this, the story will have no soul! (I feel that this film lacks the "exaggerated" component)
Tangled point 2: Our dog has rich expressions, you, you, you are really talking nonsense! (I feel that this film lacks the element of "anthropomorphic")
2⃣️My opinion: The meaning of other people's live-action animation is: use realistic-style production technology to create a real scene (in the prairie) for you to do real things (how the lion's face actually moves), Then use 3D animation technology to connect it in series.
Just like what I wrote today is an argumentative essay. When I was writing, it was suddenly changed to a narrative. Isn’t it very abrupt, the style of the painting is very strange, and I was forced to be pressed on the desktop and told me to finish writing it, otherwise you can’t go 1111
3⃣️From the point of view of the story: since the style has chosen the works of "realistic style", "prairie theme" and "majestic royal lions", it is impossible for me to portray every lion as "Pengpeng" and "Ding". Full" is so exaggerated, the lion's stillness and the movement of the little supporting characters are tight and loose, and there is a degree of relaxation. I haven't watched many domestic cartoons, sorry, so I didn't watch Jueji, I only vaguely heard that it was a 100% live-action re-enactment, but have you considered it? The background story of Jueji is also modern, and it's realistic here. The story of the lion kings is also a real version of the prairie.
Does every film have to be arranged in a spray like the little magic fairy of Balabala; in Journey to the West, is it called innovation when the monkey rides on the left side of the fog? Is it good-looking; is the performance in Avatar called realism? I think it's called science fiction.
A good film can be real, like Water Story, Blade Runner, Machina, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, including Pikachu,,,, Technology has brought realism, but you want the joints that are obviously not needed to move To squeeze out a smile for you? Does your dog really laugh? We are realistic
4⃣️As for the production process, hee hee hee, Oscar's best animated short film, delicious food, and a series of stories about the owner's love and marriage from the perspective of the dog inside. In just 3 minutes, the animator stayed with the dog. It's been half a year; then, the production of The Lion King, the early stage and the animation team really went to the grassland for a vacation! An animation made by an animator in a year only takes up 2 minutes and 120 seconds in the film. It's not that it's inefficient, it's that it's really conscientious.
5. As for the production price, I still won't talk about it, so as not to be dragged and confused with "the domestically produced bad movies with huge sums of money", I am a mere animation dog, and I don't want to be called "more money does not necessarily mean good works" by some people. A lesson in wisdom.
What I wrote today was a narrative essay, which was suddenly changed into an argumentative essay. It was not only abrupt, but also weird. I was also asked not to leave until I finished writing/You are not angry.
In a word, it is not necessary to exaggerate the expressions of the characters in the realistic style, but it is not possible. Otherwise, why should the animal world and American dramas be watched separately?
—————————————————————-
second revision
I haven't seen the real lion, but after watching the whole film, I can see the king's demeanor and the warmth of humanity from the cold and stern faces of the "overbearing president". Maybe it's all because I haven't seen a real lion speak.
Changing from 2D to 3D will always only get scolded. After the real restoration, it is not a "Come on, Mr. Zhao Zhongxiang, this is the microphone".
Is it really that bad to use a realistic style to restore a story? Or do you not need a realistic style, just use a remote control panel and watch the animal world happily?
—————————————————————
first anger
What's wrong with the whole show being an animation in a realistic style? And what happened to the lion talking?
Do you know how expensive it is to make poetry-style animations?
In particular, how troublesome is it to make the water surface? Not only burning but also time consuming.
And Simba and all the animal hairs, made piece by piece and computationally rendered.
Of course, there are still shortcomings in the story of the film. I admit that the story development is old-fashioned, but considering that this is a remake, they have not changed much.
If the style is realistic, I will be scolded, saying that it is unnecessary.
The story is creative and nonsensical (what's wrong with the lion eating insects? It doesn't match the reality?)
you
keyboard warrior
what do you want
View more about The Lion King reviews
