The difference between the original book and the movie is still a bit big. The book describes more about the impact of the war on oneself and society. Although the emotional line is also very important, it mainly focuses on the second half, but the main line is what "I" saw in the war. income. The emotional line is only a small part, and the main highlight of the movie is the emotional line.
Let's talk a little more about "pedophiles". After all, this is an autobiographical novel, and at the beginning, before the soldiers came, the male protagonist showed a certain interest in boys, such as the description of him and his partner, although not very Explicitly but also implicitly expressed his homosexuality. And after that, it seems more logical to be with the soldiers. Because it is from the perspective of "I", I don't think it is a pedophile, but if it is from the perspective of a soldier, it will appear a little sinful. And what made me relieved the most was the scene where I cried to tears in the movie at the end of the scene where the soldier said goodbye. In the movie, because of the language barrier, the soldier said a lot of goodbyes. But the little boy entered the house without looking back. The little boy thought that there might be a chance to meet again next time. It was no different from saying goodbye a few days ago. This is also the reason why the little boy went crazy looking for a soldier but found that the building was empty. The source of the sense of loss, this is also the most tear-jerking clip. In the original book, it was much calmer. The boy was taken away by his mother, and there was no goodbye or goodbye between them. , anyway, there is always someone who doesn't know that this is the last time we meet!). The little boy also learned about the Canadian Army from the radio and the news. From the description in the book, the little boy is sad and calm. That's why I think it's mainly about the social impact of war, and the emotional line is just a supplement. From the beginning of the force majeure the little boy was sent to the country, to the end of the little boy's parents (also force majeure) to pick him up home. This is mainly about the impact of the war on "me", but there is a person I love. From the perspective of the plot, if the one who falls in love is not a soldier, but a girl who was also sent to the countryside, this emotional line is also established, and it will not affect the expression of the theme very much in the end. But this emotional line is too real and abusive, homosexuality, children, sexual behavior, any of these three can write tens of thousands of words, the most important thing is the semi-open ending of the story, just like a border town" Maybe come back tomorrow, maybe never come back" Does it give hope? gave. Is it slim? As thin as fog. Even if it is not a key description, it is enough to be memorable. This also reminds me of a rotten term "the tragedy of the times". Rory talked a lot, feeling that he finally pulled it out and fell back.
View more about For a Lost Soldier reviews
