Time and money are digital things, time is money, and time is life. "Time Planning Bureau" turned this sentence into reality, taking time as the hard currency in life. Time determines living conditions and life and death at the same time. When people are 25 years old, they will stop growing and time will count down. This is a very good setting, but the plot does not reflect the charm of this setting at all. The setting is just a setting at the end and has little to do with the overall plot. Just changing this time into money, everything the male protagonist does is to get more money, and it is completely possible to shoot according to this plot without affecting it. The later stage of the film has indeed equated time and money. The feeling of the whole movie is to exchange old wine for new bottle. If the time setting is removed from this movie, and the film is renamed "Money Planning Bureau", it can also be filmed in accordance with this plot. Some people will spend more than ten lifetimes with more money. More people will worry about their daily livelihoods. I won’t be able to eat tomorrow at work, and I will be dominated by these big capitalists all my life. And some people who work for the country can't survive and starve. Money will always be available but never enough to spend. The advantage is that if you don't use it, you will have no money to spend someday. According to the scale of foreign film censorship system, there is no problem at all. The poor boy accidentally saved an empty rich man who was tired of his life and said to him that he would never spend so much money and would do something meaningful. The rich man believed that he had given the male protagonist a tens of millions of dollars and committed suicide. So the male protagonist took the money to go to the rich area to eat, drink and have fun and hook up with the wealthy daughter to experience the high life. The police discovered the death of the rich man and suspected that it was the male master's murderer through surveillance cameras. He pursued and killed the male lead, found the male lead in the rich man's home, and confiscated the male lead's property. The male protagonist decided to take a desperate fight to hijack the wealthy daughter, escape to the slum, and continue to brainwash the daughter. No one can have unlimited money, and no one has to endure poverty all his life. Everything is the fault of a big capitalist like your dad. , We can reshape the social system by knocking down your dad, and everyone has money to live a good life. The following plot is like in the movie, the hero and heroine robbed his father's money and distributed the money to the poor, disrupting the social structure and robbing the bank to survive. Become a thief couple who robbed the rich and helped the poor. Making such a slightly comedic movie is also a good popcorn movie. For Shuang drama, what rigorous logic will everyone pursue and what they want to express has deep connotations? No. However, the setting and plot given to you in the first half hour of "Time Administration" are really not the beginning of the brainless drama. The cruel social situation and the death of the male protagonist's mother, and the promise to the rich all imply the cash method of the male protagonist. It will definitely break the existing system. But forty minutes in the movie After that, all brainless operations began. The heroes and heroines looked smart, and their eyes were shining with wisdom all the time, but the things they did were really stupid and illogical. It's completely reduced to a very old-fashioned and boring popcorn story. What is the real identity of the rich man in the front? What is the real reason for the death? Why the heroine pays attention to the hero from the beginning, why the gambling will win, why the big capitalist invites the hero to the mansion, why the hero seems to be deliberately Time managers take away time the same. However, there is no explanation in the second half of the movie, that is, the rich is not important. It is just an NPC that triggers the main mission. The male protagonist is just lucky and has no unique skills. The heroine repeatedly looked at the male lead because he was not like a rich man and knocked his face. The capitalist would invite him to be purely hospitable. When the time was taken away, the male lead did not resist, and then suddenly opened up and fled the house and looted him. The heroine. There are many other outrageous plots in the movie. They all seem to be so reasonable, but they can't resist scrutiny. Since it is a movie with such a high-level setting, can't the plot character be more thoughtful in terms of behavior and motivation? The whole story seems to be different from the setting and the plot, and water and fire are incompatible. After the hostess was taken away, Stockholm is also behind. The host starts to rob the bank and divide the time. It really kills the local tyrants, divides the fields, and forces communism. In the end, all the way to hang up until his dad’s company robbed his dad for a million years, the female protagonist also learned the male protagonist’s phrase "stealing what has been stolen, is that still stealing?" This sentence is very much left by Marx. The taste of axiology. What the heroine father said to them is translated using the concept of money: "Maybe you can change one or two generations, but don't deceive yourself and others. In the end, everything will not change. Because everyone wants eternal life (rich), all People think that they have the opportunity of immortality (rich), even if all the proofs are contrary, they will feel that they will be an exception. But the fact is that if a few people want immortality (rich), many people must die (poverty) ." The hostess did not believe it, and they embarked on a path they had never imagined. But they didn't launch a mass line either. Instead, they robbed the bank and distributed money everywhere, similar to Che Guevara's shooting for another place. The thoughts and behaviors of the heroes and heroines are so similar to the behaviors of a period in history, but we already know that this method of ending will not work. Without the development of productive forces, relying on robbing the rich to reshape the social structure, the ending will be "Change one or two generations, but in the end nothing will change." The male and female leaders didn't believe it, they embarked on a path they hadn't imagined. But they didn't launch a mass line either. Instead, they robbed the bank and distributed money everywhere, similar to Che Guevara's shooting for another place. The thoughts and behaviors of the heroes and heroines are so similar to the behaviors of a period in history, but we already know that this method of ending will not work. Without the development of productive forces, relying on robbing the rich to reshape the social structure, the ending will be "Change one or two generations, but in the end nothing will change."
View more about In Time reviews
