1. The riots in the next block can no longer be controlled, and they are still happily partying? Shouldn't "sensitive and cautious" be the nature of animals higher up the food chain? Even if the individuals are negligent, they are a cluster of information exchange. Compared with our community, when the flu first started, families with the conditions sent their children to the community with better medical conditions - shouldn't this be the case?
2. The heroine's behavior is so ignorant, it's not at all what a rich child should be. They will act recklessly and cause trouble... However, on the principle of "downward compatibility", the idea should be the same as that of family and friends.
Third, take a step back, there are credit cards, mobile phone transfers, drivers... There are many ways to help. With a little use of your brain, you can achieve the same result with the least troublesome steps. Doing it yourself is by no means the rich man's way of doing things.
This is where I get confused at the beginning of the movie. No matter how realistic, reversed, and shocking the following plot is, and the initial conditions are not established, it is still fictional—this is a common way to make up stories, just like the opening of "The overbearing president loves a subsistence household even if he lives or die." No matter how bumpy and heart-wrenching the love road is, it's a farce out of reality.
Of course, a case cannot be ruled out, but since it is a case, the film should not be titled "New Order", at most a "New Method".
View more about New Order reviews
