Although young Hugh Grant was that mean and shy when he was young - in all of his films - his female audiences could not help but feel pity, although young Emma Thompson was That carefree and refreshing energy, although Liszt's actor is very immersive, this movie still makes people feel like a waste of time.
The main line is not the relationship between Chopin and George Sand, and most of it is the description of George Sand, but it is not the biography of George Sand, which makes it difficult to understand the intention of the screenwriter and director. Neither a character nor a story, what is that? If it is the process of two people getting acquainted and falling in love, then Chopin's role and performance are too few, especially the transition from panic to acceptance, which is illogical and incomprehensible. Incoherent, even if slightly hinted. In the end, how could Chopin's sensitive constitution, which was unable to be intimate with his lover, be overcome? Does love triumph over psychological factors? Completely unclear.
The actor who played George Sand is not very familiar. While she does display her energy and indifference to other people's eyes, as well as her sassiness in menswear, she seems to be pushing too hard and often makes people play. It's hard to imagine that the face and demeanor are all tomboys, why men can't extricate themselves from it, and use a duel to win her.
The stars are all about beautiful music (and when it comes to beautiful music, Chopin's Hugh Grant obviously can't play the piano, and it's entertaining to watch), and a penchant for Hugh Grant's goofiness and Emma Thompson's playfulness.
View more about Impromptu reviews
