Don't want to see exploitation in the name of love in movies anymore

Claude 2022-03-16 09:01:02

Moulin Rouge makes me angry.

Fully male narrative. It's another old-fashioned tale of "whore prostitutes" and "the virgin of sluts".

Satine, precisely because she is a beauty, and the brokenness of the beauty responds to the desire for destruction in people's hearts, the beauty is like this, so much suffering has been projected and so much pain has been carried. Completely exploited, completely shattered, and incapable of resisting, she lives a life of luxury and fading away in a fragile bubble.

All the men in her life coveted her, like those crazy men at the ball, the duke; they were all using her, using her as a money-making tool, looking for conquest and control in her and packaging it as a "Love" hero.

Does anyone love her? In this movie, there is none. The hero loves her? If you love her, will you humiliate her in public? In order to prove that he is favored by Satine, he will reveal his relationship with Satine in public, and anger the Duke who holds Satine's future? Does he know Satine? Is he trying to get to know her? Does he know Satine's dreams, and unease?

He fell in love with her only because of Satine's sparkle and attention, he just wanted to monopolize her, he just wanted to control her, and the most important reason why he fell in love with her was because Satine told him that she recognized him as a duke ! After this sentence, the male protagonist seems to have to be her, oh, really? Did the chaste male protagonist really fall in love with Satine? Of course not, this is just a man's bloody desire to win! Is there anything better than a woman favored by the superior who likes her little self? no!

And Satine was deceived by this poison packaged as "love". As an inspirational muse, a companion to let the male protagonist complete the sublimation of the work. Finally, in the curtain call of "in the name of love", at the cost of life, I have finished the journey of being exploited in this life.

And the movies 20 years ago, in the name of love, exploited women, projected their own wretched destructive desires and misogyny on women, regarded the female role as only a tool, and ignored the female subjectivity and female friendship. Talk about fucking everywhere.

And we grew up under this narrative, we longed for love, but the poisonous destruction in the name of "love" was being shown on the big and small screens. We subconsciously don't believe in friendship, or think it's extremely fragile, we're picky about the details of our appearance, because we grew up with no female role models on the mainstream screen, just beautiful girls, beautiful girls, beautiful women, and we think we are It has to be beautiful or it will "disappear" from the world.

I'm glad I saw this movie in my late 30's, she's gorgeous, dazzling, humorous, and Nicole is breathtaking, but even though it's so beautiful, what I'm watching is still fidgety, anger and disgust. I saw misogyny, saw the strangulation of female characters done by the director and screenwriter, and saw disrespect as a female audience.

View more about Moulin Rouge! reviews

Extended Reading
  • Rickey 2021-10-21 15:30:13

    The actor’s eyes and singing voice...I can’t help but make people’s heart fascinating... He also played "Guessing the Train", and he was able to do so well between rogue ruffians and infatuated talents. It’s really amazing... But I didn’t see it anyway. Nicole Kidman is so pretty, so I don’t know how he likes her...

  • Madilyn 2022-03-23 09:01:19

    Barely two points. The opening half an hour is okay, the singing and dancing are bright and chaotic, and the narrative is introduced by the male protagonist’s voiceover, which makes the Moulin Rouge song and dance subjective. The background is set in Paris in 1900, but the music has passed through (It seems that I still heard a sentence " My heart is eternal"), this kind of madness is very common in musicals, but Bazlukhman's level is a shrunken version of Julie Taymo. Entering the plot is terrible. It is just a tattered romance drama where a terminally ill beauty chooses a rich duke or a poor writer. The plot structure is also extremely simple. It is assumed that Kidman is a social flower selling love, but her actual performance is a village girl who has never seen the world. Kidman and Ivan’s opponent playfully wrote the broth and water. This pair is only a gesture of love. No content of love, love is slogan. The singing and dancing in the back are not good either. The sections and singing and dancing that deceive the Duke are all clown-like performances. Kidman also performed too hard, and the scenes are always in the theater, which makes it easy to get bored.

Moulin Rouge! quotes

  • Zidler: She said you make her feel "like a virgin."

    The Duke: Virgin?

    Zidler: You know, touched for the very first time.

  • Satine: I can't believe it. I'm in love. I'm in love with a young, handsome, talented duke.

    Christian: Duke?

    Satine: Not that the title's important, of course.

    Christian: I'm not a duke.

    Satine: Not a duke?

    Christian: I'm a writer.

    Satine: A writer?